CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 9Indigenous Peoples' Rights and LawIndigenous Cultures and HistoryAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics

The Consent Paradigm: Tribal Sovereignty at the Millennium

Gould, L. Scott·1996·Columbia Law Review
DOI 10.2307/1123429
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1123429

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tribal sovereignty exists 'only where the acts of Congress have not displaced it'.

    “tribal sovereignty exists 'only where the acts of Congress have not displaced it' (Gould 1996: 811).”

    From Building a data revolution in Indian country (2016) · cites this paper as Gould 1996: 811

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gould, L. S.
Corresponding author
Gould, L. Scott
Venue
Columbia Law Review
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1996-05
Volume
96
Issue
4
Pages
809
ISSN
0010-1958 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2307/1123429
OpenAlex
W2797459371
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Columbia Law Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › American Constitutional Law and Politics
Keywords
tribal sovereignty, consent, tribal law, indigenous peoples, tribal self-governance, tribal jurisdiction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review