The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Reliability and Stability of Individual Differences in Infant-Mother Attachment
Abstract
50 infants were seen twice in the Ainsworth and Wittig Strange Situation to assess individual differences in the quality of infant-mother attachment at 12 and at 18 months of age. Evidence for the stability of individual differences was clearly a function of the level of analysis. The reliability of discrete-behavior variables was typically very low, and there was little evidence of temporal stability. There was clear evidence for stable individual differences in the analysis of behavior category data. This was especially true of behavior toward the mother during reunion after brief separations. Classification data based largely on reunion behavior and crying were even more stable across the 6-month interval. Each infant was assigned to 1 of 3 categories (secure/normative, avoidant, or ambivalent) on the basis of the patterning of attachment behavior at 12 months. 48 of the 50 infants were independently reassigned to the same category on the basis of the same behaviors at 18 months. In contrast to time sampling of phenotypically similar discrete behaviors, assessments which take into account the behavioral context of behavior yield more reliable assessments of individual differences in the quality of infant-adult relationships. Reprinted from: CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1978, 49, 483-494.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Observational study of behavior: sampling methods
Altmann, J. (1974) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853974x00534 · Cited by 13,891
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
Cited by
Armsden, G. C., & Greenberg, M. T. (1987) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/bf02202939 · Cited by 4,031
Avoidance of Intimacy: An Attachment Perspective
Bartholomew, K. (1990) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407590072001 · Cited by 2,153
Attachment and development: A prospective, longitudinal study from birth to adulthood
Sroufe, L. A. (2005) · Attachment & Human Development · doi:10.1080/14616730500365928 · Cited by 1,685
Attachment Security in Infancy and Early Adulthood: A Twenty-Year Longitudinal Study
Waters, E., Merrick, S., Treboux, D., Crowell, J., & Albersheim, L. (2000) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00176 · Cited by 1,228
Self-citationChris Fraley, R. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0602_03 · Cited by 1,066
Metadata
- Authors
- Waters, E.
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1978-06-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 483-483
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164067488
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 24.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Reliability and Stability of Individual Differences in Infant-Mother Attachment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1978.tb02339.x
- The paper
- Waters, E. (1978). The Reliability and Stability of Individual Differences in Infant-Mother Attachment. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1978.tb02339.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.