Cited by 219Reading and Literacy DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyLanguage Development and Disorders

Cross-National Comparisons of Developmental Dyslexia in Italy and the United States

Lindgren, Scott D., de Renzi, Ennio, Richman, Lynn C.·1985·Child Development

Abstract

This study was designed to examine whether the phonetic regularity of a language can significantly influence the prevalence and pattern of developmental dyslexia. Demographically matched samples of fifth-grade children in Italy (N = 448) and the United States (N = 1,278) were evaluated to identify children with specific reading disabilities. Reading disabled children with average intelligence were compared to normal controls on a series of neuropsychological tests to evaluate specific cognitive deficits associated with reading disorders in each country. The findings suggested that (a) dyslexia is more prevalent in the United States than in Italy, (b) reading disabilities are strongly associated with disorders of verbal processing in both countries, although some American dyslexics also show visual-motor deficits, and (c) there is a greater dissociation between reading comprehension and decoding in Italian than in English.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1130460

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lindgren, De Renzi and Richman (1985) found prevalences varying between 4.5% to 12% in the United States and 3.6% to 8.5% in Italy, attributed to differences in orthographic transparency.

    “Lindgren, De Renzi and Richman (1985) compared three definitions on American and Italian students samples, and found prevalences varying between 4.5% to 12% in the United-States and 3.6% to 8.5% in Italy, the difference being attributed to differences in orthographic transparency.”

    From Epidemiology of reading disability: A comparison of DSM-5 and ICD-11 criteria (2022) · cites this paper as Lindgren, De Renzi and Richman (1985)

  • The authors' results are consistent with the suggestion that high-IQ children are at much lower, not higher, risk of dyslexia.

    “Finally, our results are consistent with [23], in suggesting that high-IQ children are at much lower, not higher, risk of dyslexia.”
  • Studies that revealed cross-language transfer of morphological skills support Cummins's Interdependence Hypothesis, while findings of non-transfer of morphological awareness from English to other languages with shallow orthographies support the Script Dependent Hypothesis.

    “In summary, studies that revealed cross-language transfer of morphological skills support Cummins's IH (1979,1981), while findings of non-transfer of morphological awareness from English to other languages with shallow orthographies support the SDH (Liberman et al., 1974;Lindgren et al., 1985).”
  • There was no transfer of orthographic skills from English L3 to either Arabic L1 or Hebrew L2.

    “In conclusion, the findings indicate that there was no transfer of orthographic skills from English L3 to either Arabic L1 or Hebrew L2, which supports the Script Dependent Hypothesis (Liberman et al., 1974;Lindgren et al., 1985).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindgren, S. D., de Renzi, E., & Richman, L. C.
Venue
Child Development
Published
1985-12
Volume
56
Issue
6
Pages
1404
ISSN
0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969836206
Cited by
219
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 32802)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 15026)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
developmental dyslexia, cross-national comparison, reading disorders, prevalence, reading comprehension, decoding, Italian language, English language, fifth grade students
MeSH terms
Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Dyslexia, Humans, Italy, Language, Phonetics, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review