The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Persistence of the Recitation
Abstract
The classroom observational studies reviewed here are those concerned primarily with describing instructional practices, as opposed to describing the psychological concomitants of different practices. Several of the studies reviewed-favorably comparable to more recent research-apparently had been allowed to fade from the collective memory of the profession before the recent flurry of interest in observational research in the classroom, and we take pleasure in helping to resurrect them. In 1966, the authors assisted Professor Bryce Hudgins in the collection of data, including tape recordings of lessons, in the classes of nine junior high school English teachers (Hudgins and Ahlbrand, 1967; Hoetker, 1967). Because of a special interest of one of the authors in the work of Arno Bellack and his associates on the rules of the classroom language game (Bellack, et. al., 1966), forty-five hours of typescripts made from the tape recordings were coded according to selected parts of the category system devised by Bellack (Hoetker, 1967). The teachers in our sample, as may be seen from the comparisons summarized in Table 1, behaved very precisely according to Bellack's rules, and we raised three questions about this finding. First, why did the teachers behave as they did? Second, what were the effects of this sort of teaching upon the pupils? And,
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research
Engeström, Y. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139814744 · Cited by 4,991
Four Ages of Professionalism and Professional Learning
Hargreaves, A. (2000) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/713698714 · Cited by 1,187
Reforming Again, Again, and Again
Cuban, L. (1990) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.2307/1176529 · Cited by 957
Group Work, Interlanguage Talk, and Second Language Acquisition
Long, M. H., & Porter, P. A. (1985) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586827 · Cited by 901
In Defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and Real Issues
Long, M. H. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190515000057 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoetker, J., & Ahlbrand, W. P.
- Venue
- American Educational Research Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1969-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145
- ISSN
- 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029128851
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Persistence of the Recitation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1161891
- The paper
- Hoetker, J., & Ahlbrand, W. P. (1969). The Persistence of the Recitation. American Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/1161891
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.