Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 957

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Understanding Reading: A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Reading and Learning to Read

Samuels, S. Jay, Pearson, P. David, Smith, Frank·1972·American Educational Research Journal

Abstract

Contents: Preface to the Sixth Edition. The Essence of Reading. Comprehension and Knowledge. Spoken and Written Language. Information and Experience. Between Eye and Brain. Bottlenecks of Memory. Letter Identification. Word Identification. Phonics and Mediated Word Identification. The Identification of Meaning. Reading, Writing, and Thinking. Learning About the World. Learning About Written Language.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1162059

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 957

Metadata

Authors
Samuels, S. J., Pearson, P. D., & Smith, F.
Venue
American Educational Research Journal
Published
1972
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
165
ISSN
0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089324066
Cited by
957
References
0
FWCI
22.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding Reading: A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Reading and Learning to Read. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1162059
The paper
Samuels, S. J., Pearson, P. D., & Smith, F. (1972). Understanding Reading: A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Reading and Learning to Read. American Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/1162059

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.