The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Influences on the Choice of Math/Science Major by Gender and Ethnicity
Abstract
Women and minorities continue to be underrepresented in quantitatively based fields of study. Additionally, selection by all students of such majors is declining. Math/Science major choice is of concern in light of the occupational demands created by advancing technology as well as the potential gaps in occupational and economic attainment of women and minorities. This article reports the analysis of a longitudinal model of math/science major choice upon entrance to college for black and white, female and male students. The model was tested using a sample drawn from the “High School and Beyond” data base. The model included background characteristics of students, ability, and an array of high school experience factors to explain choice of quantitative major. Significant predictors of major choice for the subgroups included sophomore choice of major, mathematics attitudes, math and science completed by senior year, and various parental factors. However, there were differences across groups and the model explained nearly twice as much variance for the black male, black female, and white male subgroups compared with the white female subgroup. Recommendations include broadening our ways of researching migration into and out of the mathematics/science pipeline. Argument is made for a focus on success of students enrolled in low level college mathematics classes as a way of augmenting the mathematics/scientific pipeline.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L., & Orfield, G. (2011) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.81.2.t022245n7x4752v2 · Cited by 974
Wang, X. (2013) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831213488622 · Cited by 896
Crisp, G., Nora, A., & Taggart, A. (2009) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831209349460 · Cited by 497
STEM enrichment programs and graduate school matriculation: the role of science identity salience
Merolla, D. M., & Serpe, R. T. (2013) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-013-9233-7 · Cited by 158
The Earnings Benefits of Majoring in STEM Fields Among High Achieving Minority Students
Melguizo, T., & Wolniak, G. C. (2012) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-011-9238-z · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Maple, S. A., & Stage, F. K.
- Venue
- American Educational Research Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37
- ISSN
- 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043972138
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influences on the Choice of Math/Science Major by Gender and Ethnicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1162878
- The paper
- Maple, S. A., & Stage, F. K. (1991). Influences on the Choice of Math/Science Major by Gender and Ethnicity. American Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/1162878
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.