The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Earnings Benefits of Majoring in STEM Fields Among High Achieving Minority Students
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
SOME PRACTICAL GUIDANCE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING
Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x · Cited by 6,238
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 61
- Anderson, E., & Kim, D. (2006). Increasing the success of minority students in science and technology. Washington: American Council on Education.
- Andrews, D. W., & Buchinsky, M. (2001). Evaluation of a three-step method for choosing the number of bootstrap repetitions. Journal of Econometrics, 103, 345–386. · DOI
- Barron’s Profiles of American Colleges. (1999). Profiles of American colleges (23rd ed.). Woodbury: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc.
- Becker, G. (1967). Human capital and the personal distribution of income: An analytical approach. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
- Berger, M. C. (1988). Predicted future earnings and choice of college major. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 41(3), 418–429. · DOI
- Björklund, A., & Kjellström, C. (2002). Estimating the return to investments in education: How useful is the standard Mincerian equation? Economics of Education Review, 21, 195–210. · DOI
- Black, D., & Smith, J. (2004). How robust is the evidence on the effects on college quality? Evidence from matching. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 99–124. · DOI · Paper page
- Cohn, E., & Geske, T. G. (1990). The economics of education (3rd ed.). New York: Pergamon Press.
- Dale, S. B., & Krueger, A. B. (2002). Estimating the payoff to attending a more selective college: An application of selection on observables and unobservables. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1491–1527. · DOI · Paper page
- Daymont, T. N., & Andrisani, P. J. (1984). Job preferences, college major, and the gender gap in earnings. Journal of Human Resources, 19(3), 408–428. · DOI
- Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score matching methods for non-experimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 151–161. · DOI
- Gerald, D. E., & Hussar, W. J. (2002). Projections of education statistics to 2012. NCES Report No. 2002030. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
- Griliches, Z. (1977). Estimating the returns to schooling: Some econometric problems. Econometrica, 45, 1–21. · DOI
- Grubb, W. N. (1992). The economic returns to baccalaureate degrees: New evidence from the class of 1972. The Review of Higher Education, 15, 213–231. · DOI
- Grubb, W. N. (1997). The returns to education in the sub-baccalaureate labor market, 1984–1990. Economics of Education Review, 16, 231–245. · DOI
- Gwartney, J. D., & Long, J. E. (1978). The relative earnings of blacks and other minorities. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 31, 336–346. · DOI
- Hanson, S. L. (2004). African American women in science: Experiences from high school through the post-secondary years and beyond. National Women’s Study Association Journal, 16, 96–115.
- Hecker, D. (1996). Earnings and major field of study of college graduates. Occupational Outlook Quarterly, 40(2), 10–21.
- Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161. · DOI · Paper page
- Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Kienzl, G. S., George-Jackson, C. E., & Trent, W. (2009). Underrepresented students entering STEM fields. San Diego: American Education Research Association.
- Knox, W. E., Lindsay, P., & Kolb, M. N. (1993). Does college make a difference? Long-term changes in activities and attitudes. Westport: Greenwood Press.
- Leslie, L. L., McClure, G. T., & Oaxaca, R. L. (1998). Women and minorities in science and engineering: A life sequence analysis. The Journal of Higher Education, 69, 239–276. · DOI
- Leslie, L. L., & Oaxaca, R. L. (1998). Women and minorities in higher education. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 13, pp. 304–352), New York: Agathon Press.
- Levine, J., & Wycokoff, J. (1991). Predicting persistence and success in baccalaureate engineering. Education, 111, 461–468.
- Maple, S. A., & Stage, F. K. (1991). Influences on the choice of math/science major by gender and ethnicity. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 37–60. · DOI
- Melguizo, T. (2010). Are students of color more likely to graduate from college if they attend more selective institutions? Evidence from the first cohort of recipients and non-recipients of the Gates Millennium Scholarship (GMS) program. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 230–248. · DOI
- Melguizo, T., Kienzl, G., & Alfonso, M. (Forthcoming). Comparing the educational attainment of community college transfer students and four-year rising juniors using propensity score matching methods. The Journal of Higher Education.
- Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling experience, and earnings. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Monks, J. (2000). The returns to individual and college characteristics: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Economics of Education Review, 19, 279–289. · DOI
- Montmarquette, C., Cannings, K., & Mahseredjian, S. (2002). How do young people choose college majors? Economics of Education Review, 21, 543–556. · DOI
- Murnane, R. J., & Willett, J. B. (2011). Methods matter: Improving causal inference in educational and social science research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- National Academy of Science (NAS). (2005). Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington: National Academies Press.
- Oakes, J. (1990). Opportunities, achievement, and choice: Women and minority students in science and mathematics. Review of Research in Education, 16, 153–222.
- Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students revisited: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Paulsen, M. B. (1998). Recent research on the economics of attending college: Returns on investment and responsiveness to price. Research in Higher Education, 39, 471–498. · DOI
- Paulsen, M. B. (2001). The economics of human capital and investment in higher education. In M. Paulsen & J. Smart (Eds.), The finance of higher education: Theory, research, policy, & practice (pp. 55–94). New York: Agathon Press.
- Reynolds, C. L., & Desjardins, S. L. (2009). The use of matching methods in higher education: Answering whether attendance at a 2-year institution results in differences in educational attainment. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Practice, XXIII, 47–104. · DOI · Paper page
- Roksa, J. (2005). Double disadvantage or blessing in disguise? Understanding the relationship between college major and employment. Sociology of Education, 78(3), 207–232. · DOI
- Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55. · DOI · Paper page
- Rosenfeld, R. A., & Kalleberg, A. L. (1990). A cross-national comparison of the gender gap in income. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 69–106. · DOI
- Rumberger, R. W., & Thomas, S. L. (1993). The economic returns to college major, quality and performance: A multilevel analysis of recent graduates. Economics of Education Review, 12, 1–19. · DOI
- Schneider, B., Carnoy, M., Kilpatrick, J., Schmidt, W., & Shavelson, R. (2007). Estimating causal effects using experimental and observational designs: A think tank white paper. Washington: American Education Research Association.
- Sedlacek, W. E. (2004). Beyond the big test: Noncognitive assessment in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Sianesi, B. (2004). An evaluation of the active labour market programmes in Sweden. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 133–155. · DOI
- Smart, J. C., Feldman, K. A., & Ethington, C. A. (2000). Academic disciplines: Holland’s theory and the study of college students and faculty. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
- Song, C., & Glick, J. E. (2004). College attendance and choice of college majors among Asian-American students. Social Science Quarterly (Blackwell Publishing Limited), 85, 1401–1421. · DOI · Paper page
- St. John, E. P., & Chung, C. (2004). Student aid and major choice: A study of high-achieving students of color. In E. P. St. John (Ed.), Readings on equal education: Improving access and college success for diverse students (Vol. 20, pp. 217–247). New York: AMS Press.
- St. John, E. P., Hu, S., Simmons, A., Carter, D. F., & Weber, J. (2004). What difference does a major make? The influence of college major field on persistence by African American and White students. Research in Higher Education, 45, 209–232. · DOI
- Taylor, D. (2007). Employment preferences and salary expectations of students in science and engineering. Bioscience, 57(2), 175–185. · DOI
- Thomas, S. L. (2000). Deferred costs and economic returns to college major, quality, and performance. Research in Higher Education, 41, 281–313. · DOI
- Thomas, S. L. (2003). Longer-term economic effects of college selectivity and control. Research in Higher Education, 44, 263–299. · DOI
- Tienda, M., & Li, D. T. (1987). Minority concentration and earnings inequality: Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians compared. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 141–165. · DOI
- Trusty, J. (2002). Effects of high school course-taking and other variables on choice of science and mathematics college majors. Journal of Counseling & Development, 80, 464. · DOI
- Turner, S. E., & Bowen, W. G. (1999). Choice of major: The changing (unchanging) gender gap. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 52, 289–313. · DOI
- van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2002). Field of study, acquired skills, and the wage benefits from a matching job. Acta Sociologica, 45, 287–303. · DOI
- Willis, R. J., & Rosen, S. (1979). Education and self-selection. Journal of Political Economy, 87, S7–S35. · DOI
- Wolniak, G. C. (2004). How major field of study in college affects job satisfaction: A study of the job satisfaction of college alumni and influences of undergraduate major, major-job field congruence, and income. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
- Wolniak, G. C., & Pascarella, E. T. (2005). The effects of college major and job field congruence on job satisfaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 233–251. · DOI
- Wolniak, G. C., Seifert, T. A., Reed, E. J., & Pascarella, E. T. (2008). College majors and social mobility. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 26, 123–139. · DOI
- Zhang, L. (2008). Gender and racial gaps in earnings among recent college graduates. The Review of Higher Education, 32(1), 51–72. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ball, C., Huang, K.-T., Rikard, R. V., & Cotten, S. R. (2019) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2017.1355403 · Cited by 53
Gaviola, A. L. C., Abaño, M. E. J. C., Buenafe, N. P. C., Lachica, J. M. R., Pepito, F. J. H., Jr, R. J. A., Doloso, R. C., & Petalla, M. B. (2023) · Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies · doi:10.9734/ajess/2023/v49i21120 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Melguizo, T., & Wolniak, G. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Melguizo, Tatiana
- ORCID
- Wolniak, Gregory C.
- Venue
- Research in Higher Education
- Published
- 2011-09-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 383-405
- ISSN
- 0361-0365 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-188X
- OpenAlex
- W1986949222
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 8.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Research in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
- Keywords
- STEM majors, college major choice, early career earnings, minority students, high-achieving students, earnings premium, self-selection, labor market outcomes, educational attainment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review