The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Building Student Capacity for Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning: An Analysis of Mathematical Tasks Used in Reform Classrooms
Abstract
This article focuses on mathematical tasks as important vehicles for building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning. A stratified random sample of 144 mathematical tasks used during reform-oriented instruction was analyzed in terms of (a) task features (number of solution strategies, number and kind of representations, and communication requirements) and (b) cognitive demands (e.g., memorization, the use of procedures with [and without] connections to concepts, the “doing of mathematics”). The findings suggest that teachers were selecting and setting up the kinds of tasks that reformers argue should lead to the development of students’ thinking capacities. During task implementation, the task features tended to remain consistent with how they were set up, but the cognitive demands of high-level tasks had a tendency to decline. The ways in which high-level tasks declined as well as factors associated with task changes from the set-up to implementation phase were explored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.2307/749690 · Cited by 884
Self-citationStein, M. K., & Lane, S. (1996) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/1380361960020103 · Cited by 592
Self-citation
Cited by
Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008) · Mathematical Thinking and Learning · doi:10.1080/10986060802229675 · Cited by 1,222
Self-citationEngle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2004_1 · Cited by 1,161
Rethinking Scale: Moving Beyond Numbers to Deep and Lasting Change
Coburn, C. E. (2003) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x032006003 · Cited by 1,030
Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.2307/749690 · Cited by 884
Self-citationStein, M. K., & Lane, S. (1996) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/1380361960020103 · Cited by 592
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M.
- Venue
- American Educational Research Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 455
- ISSN
- 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122909371
- Cited by
- 1,306
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 42.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Building Student Capacity for Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning: An Analysis of Mathematical Tasks Used in Reform Classrooms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1163292
- The paper
- Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building Student Capacity for Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning: An Analysis of Mathematical Tasks Used in Reform Classrooms. American Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163292
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.