Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 249

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Contingency Table Models for Assessing Item Bias

Mellenbergh, Gideon J.·1982·Journal of Educational Statistics

Abstract

Two strategies for assessing item bias are discussed: Methods based on Item x Group interaction and methods that compare the probabilities of a correct response for different groups conditional on ability level. In latent trait models, correct response probabilties are compared conditional on latent ability; in Scheuneman’s (1979) method these probabilities are compared conditional on the observed test score. Scheuneman’s method is modified to fit the general theory of loglinear and logit models for contingency tables. A distinction is made between uniform and nonuniform item bias, and a method to assess item bias and distinguish between uniform and nonuniform bias is described. Data reported by Scheuneman are used to demonstrate the method in detail; the differences obtained with Scheuneman’s method are discussed. In addition, the method is applied to two tests administered by van der Flier (1980) in Kenya and Tanzania, and the results are compared to those obtained with Scheuneman’s approach.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1164960

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 249

Metadata

Authors
Mellenbergh, G. J.
Venue
Journal of Educational Statistics
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1982
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
105
ISSN
0362-9791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034931437
Cited by
249
References
0
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contingency Table Models for Assessing Item Bias. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1164960
The paper
Mellenbergh, G. J. (1982). Contingency Table Models for Assessing Item Bias. Journal of Educational Statistics. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164960

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.