The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Logistic Regression Procedures
Abstract
A logistic regression model for characterizing differential item functioning (DIF) between two groups is presented. A distinction is drawn between uniform and nonuniform DIF in terms of the parameters of the model. A statistic for testing the hypothesis of no DIF is developed. Through simulation studies, it is shown that the logistic regression procedure is more powerful than the Mantel‐Haenszel procedure for detecting nonuniform DIF and as powerful in detecting uniform DIF.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multivariate Statistical Methods
(2008) · Encyclopedia of Public Health · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5614-7_2263 · Cited by 5,580
Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985) · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-1988-9 · Cited by 1,777
Self-citationDifferential Item Performance and the Mantel–Haenszel Procedure
(2013) · Test Validity · doi:10.4324/9780203056905-19 · Cited by 721
The Area between Two Item Characteristic Curves
Raju, N. S. (1988) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294403 · Cited by 415
Contingency Table Models for Assessing Item Bias
Mellenbergh, G. J. (1982) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164960 · Cited by 249
Shepard, L. A., Camilli, G., & Averill, M. (1981) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986006004317 · Cited by 160
Detecting Potentially Biased Test Items: Comparison of IRT Area and Mantel-Haenszel Methods
Hambleton, R. K., & Rogers, H. J. (1989) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1207/s15324818ame0204_4 · Cited by 119
Self-citationShepard, L. A., Camilli, G., & Averill, M. (1981) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164616 · Cited by 65
SAT Differential Item Performance for Nine Handicapped Groups
Bennett, R. E., Rock, D. A., & Kaplan, B. A. (1987) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1987.tb00260.x · Cited by 47
Cited by
Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107415188 · Cited by 2,612
ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second Edition)
(2018) · International Journal of Testing · doi:10.1080/15305058.2017.1398166 · Cited by 789
Rutkowski, L., & Svetina, D. (2014) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164413498257 · Cited by 767
Shealy, R., & Stout, W. (1993) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294572 · Cited by 657
Kayser, L., Karnoe, A., Furstrand, D., Batterham, R., Christensen, K. B., Elsworth, G., & Osborne, R. H. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.8371 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Measurement
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-12
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 361-370
- ISSN
- 0022-0655 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-3984
- OpenAlex
- W2099019452
- Cited by
- 1,073
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 8.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Logistic Regression Procedures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1990.tb00754.x
- The paper
- Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1990). Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Logistic Regression Procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1990.tb00754.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
