Cited by 237Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsCommunication in Education and HealthcareIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Help-Seeking Behavior in Learning

Gall, Sharon Nelson-Le·1985·Review of Research in Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1167146

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gall, S. N.-L.
Corresponding author
Gall, Sharon Nelson-Le
Venue
Review of Research in Education
Published
1985
Volume
12
Pages
55
ISSN
0091-732X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062485768
Cited by
237
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of Research in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
help-seeking, learning, student help-seeking, academic support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review