The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Studies of College Attrition: 1950-1975
Abstract
For every ten students who enter college in the United States, only four will graduate from that college four years later. One more will eventually graduate from the college at some point after those four years. Of the five students who dropped out of the college altogether, four will reenroll at a different college, and of those four reenrollees, only two will graduate. Of the six students who dropped out, three did so during the first year. Two more dropped out during the second year, and the last one dropped out at some point after the second year. Three of the ten students who originally entered college will never obtain a college degree. This means that of the estimated 7.6 million undergraduate students enrolled in the U.S. in 1971, roughly 2.3 million students will drop out of higher education completely (Eckland, 1964a; Iffert, 1957; Statistical Abstracts, 1974). In terms of sheer numbers, the attrition problem deserves the attention of those interested in and affiliated with institutions of higher education. From the institutional point of view, attrition has a heavy impact on institutional operations and finance. From the student's point of view, the effect of dropping out, although difficult to gauge, is also another important aspect of the attrition problem. The need to understand this phenomenon becomes more urgent every day. What is known about attrition? What are the results of the immense amount of research that is being conducted in this field? This article summarizes the past
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of ego-identity status.
Marcia, J. E. (1966) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0023281 · Cited by 5,172
Cited by
A Conceptual Model of Nontraditional Undergraduate Student Attrition
Bean, J. P., & Metzner, B. S. (1985) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543055004485 · Cited by 2,017
First-generation college students: Characteristics, experiences, and cognitive development
Terenzini, P. T., Springer, L., Yaeger, P. M., Pascarella, E. T., & Nora, A. (1996) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/bf01680039 · Cited by 1,040
Emotional, Social, and Academic Adjustment of College Students: A Longitudinal Study of Retention
Gerdes, H., & Mallinckrodt, B. (1994) · Journal of Counseling & Development · doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1994.tb00935.x · Cited by 773
The role of finances in the persistence process: A structural model
Cabrera, A. F., Nora, A., & Casta�eda, M. B. (1992) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/bf00973759 · Cited by 517
First-Year Students’ Adjustment to University Life as a Function of Relationships with Parents
Wintre, M. G., & Yaffe, M. (2000) · Journal of Adolescent Research · doi:10.1177/0743558400151002 · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Pantages, T. J., & Creedon, C. F.
- Venue
- Review of Educational Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1978
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49
- ISSN
- 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022797366
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 94.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.