The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effects of Nonpromotion on Elementary and Junior High School Pupils: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
In this study data from all studies identified as meeting the selection criteria were mathematically integrated to determine the effect of grade-level retention on elementary and/or junior high school pupils. When each effect size calculated was treated equally, a grand mean effect size of −.37 was obtained indicating that, on the average, promoted children scored .37 standard deviation units higher than retained children on the various outcome measures. When the effect sizes within each study were first averaged so that each study could be given equal weight, a grand mean of −.34 was obtained. By using the effect sizes from only those studies in which the promoted and nonpromoted pupils had been matched, a grand mean of −.38 was calculated. The high degree of consistency in these measures lends credibility to the validity of these findings. In addition to the grand means, effects sizes were calculated on various dependent variable measures, including academic achievement (further subdivided into various areas), personal adjustment (which included self-concept, social adjustment, and emotional adjustment), and attitude toward school, behavior, and attendance. In all cases, the outcomes for promoted pupils were more positive than for retained pupils.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies.
Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.32.9.752 · Cited by 2,154
Cited by
Meta-analysis of Grade Retention Research: Implications for Practice in the 21st Century
Jimerson, S. R. (2001) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.2001.12086124 · Cited by 597
Frank, K. A., Maroulis, S. J., Duong, M. Q., & Kelcey, B. M. (2013) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/0162373713493129 · Cited by 406
Grade Retention and School Dropout: Investigating the Association
Roderick, M. (1994) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1163393 · Cited by 349
Academic achievement among formerly homeless adolescents and their continuously housed peers
Rafferty, Y., Shinn, M., & Weitzman, B. C. (2004) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2004.02.002 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Holmes, C. T., & Matthews, K. M.
- Venue
- Review of Educational Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1984
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 225
- ISSN
- 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163930669
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 42.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects of Nonpromotion on Elementary and Junior High School Pupils: A Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1170303
- The paper
- Holmes, C. T., & Matthews, K. M. (1984). The Effects of Nonpromotion on Elementary and Junior High School Pupils: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170303
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.