Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 233

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analyzing and Interpreting Significant MANOVAs

Bray, James H., Maxwell, Scott E.·1982·Review of Educational Research

Abstract

Multivariate statistical methods have been strongly recommended in educational and psychological research, which employs multiple dependent variables. While the techniques are readily available there is still controversy as to the proper use of the methods. This paper reviews the available methods for analyzing and interpreting data with multivariate analysis of variance and provides some guidelines for their use. In addition, causal models that underlie the various methods are presented to facilitate the use and understanding of the methods

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1170422

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 233

Metadata

Authors
Bray, J. H., & Maxwell, S. E.
Venue
Review of Educational Research
Published
1982
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
340
ISSN
0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110467271
Cited by
233
References
1
FWCI
6.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analyzing and Interpreting Significant MANOVAs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1170422
The paper
Bray, J. H., & Maxwell, S. E. (1982). Analyzing and Interpreting Significant MANOVAs. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170422

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.