The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“this study strictly followed the meta-analysis criteria proposed by Glass (1976)”
From A study of the impact of project-based learning on student learning effects: a meta-analysis study (2023) · cites this paper as Glass (1976)
In the citing paper
“In comparison to the narrative review i.e., traditional way of drawing common inferences from the related studies, metaanalysis provides relatively unbiased, rigorous, and trustworthy (Glass 1976; Sharma and Yetton 2003) inferences.”
From Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model (2019) · cites this paper as Glass 1976
In the citing paper
“Meta-analysis enables results from multiple studies (Glass 1976; Hunter and Schmidt 1990; Rana et al. 2015a; Wu and Du 2012; Wu and Lederer 2009) to be accumulated for estimates of the true effect sizes of relationships.”
From Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model (2019) · cites this paper as Glass 1976
Citations
Cites
Review of Educational Research.
Good, H. G. (1924) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0064223 · Cited by 1,223
Dunkin, M. J., & Biddle, B. J. (1974) · Cited by 1,102
Response Effects in Surveys: A Review and Synthesis.
King, B. F., Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. M. (1976) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2285784 · Cited by 644
On Equality of Educational Opportunity.
Milner, M., Mosteller, F. C., & Moynihan, D. P. (1973) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2062443 · Cited by 526
Accumulating Evidence: Procedures for Resolving Contradictions among Different Research Studies
Light, R., & Smith, P. (1971) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.41.4.437714870334w144 · Cited by 444
The Effectiveness of Alternative Instructional Media: A Survey
Jamison, D. T., Suppes, P., & Wells, S. J. (1974) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543044001001 · Cited by 264
The Research Evidence on the Effects of Grade Retention
Jackson, G. B. (1975) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543045004613 · Cited by 217
Experimental Factors Related to Aptitude-Treatment Interactions
Bracht, G. H. (1970) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543040005627 · Cited by 201
Allen, V. L., & Deutsch, M. (1969) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1161904 · Cited by 197
The Research Evidence on the Effects of Grade Retention
Jackson, G. B. (1975) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170067 · Cited by 167
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Elashoff JD, 1971, Pygmalion reconsidered
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
Viechtbauer, W. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · Cited by 20,464
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines
Snyder, H. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 · Cited by 11,524
The integrative review: updated methodology
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x · Cited by 10,241
Metadata
- Authors
- GLASS, G. V.
- Affiliations
- Laboratory of Educational Research University of Colorado
- Corresponding author
- GLASS, GENE V
- ORCID
- GLASS, GENE V
- Venue
- Educational Researcher
- Published
- 1976-11
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3-8
- ISSN
- 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-102X
- OpenAlex
- W1982070737
- Cited by
- 4,890
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 127 · 2025: 148 · 2024: 127 · 2023: 171 · 2022: 205 · 2021: 239 · 2020: 220 · 2019: 214 · 2018: 196 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 213 · 2015: 225 · 2014: 187 · 2013: 198 · 2012: 181
- FWCI
- 1.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Researcher (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- primary research, secondary research, meta-analysis, evidence synthesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
