The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimentation with Human Beings
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What to Tell Cancer Patients: A Study of Medical Attitudes
Oken, D. (1961) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1961.03040130004002 · Cited by 632
Wolf, S. (1959) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(25)06972-8 · Cited by 173
The Education of the Physician-Investigator.
Katz, J. (1969) · Daedalus · Cited by 89
Self-citation
Cited by
What Makes Clinical Research Ethical?
Emanuel, E. J. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.20.2701 · Cited by 2,710
Dobelle, W. H., Mladejovsky, M. G., & Girvin, J. P. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.183.4123.440 · Cited by 440
The Limitations of “Vulnerability” as a Protection for Human Research Participants
Levine, C., Faden, R., Grady, C., Hammerschmidt, D., Eckenwiler, L., & Sugarman, J. (2004) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265160490497083 · Cited by 438
Reflections and recommendations on research ethics in developing countries
Benatar, S. R. (2002) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00327-6 · Cited by 373
Verwissenschaftlichung der Gesellschaft – Politisierung der Wissenschaft
Weingart, P. (1983) · Zeitschrift für Soziologie · doi:10.1515/zfsoz-1983-0303 · Cited by 165
Metadata
- Authors
- Katz, J.
- Venue
- Stanford Law Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1972-11
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 117
- ISSN
- 0038-9765 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2255056832
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimentation with Human Beings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1227842
- The paper
- Katz, J. (1972). Experimentation with Human Beings. Stanford Law Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1227842
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
