Procedural Justice as Fairness
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A significant body of research in legal and organisational psychology suggests that people do not only care about whether the outcome of a decision benefits them, but also whether it meets standards of justice.
“A significant body of research in legal and organisational psychology suggests that people do not only care about whether the outcome of a decision benefits them, but also whether it meets standards of justice [71, 40, 11].”
From 'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage': Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions (2018) · cites this paper as [71]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage': Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions
Binns, R., Van Kleek, M., Veale, M., Lyngs, U., Zhao, J., & Shadbolt, N. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173951 · Cited by 691 · see citing works
- Authors
- Thibaut, J., Walker, L., LaTour, S., & Houlden, P.
- Venue
- Stanford Law Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1974-06
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1271
- ISSN
- 0038-9765 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2797138839
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 18.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Stanford Law Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Law and Evidence
- Keywords
- procedural justice, fairness, legal procedure, due process, judicial decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
