Agricultural Productivity and Sources of Growth in South Asia
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Attributing 34% of productivity growth (and thus carbon savings, or ∼36 tC/ha) to agricultural R&D and assuming that 70% of R&D is relevant to farm productivity gives a carbon price of $14.74 in AW1 and $27.43 in AW2 per metric ton of carbon.
“Attributing 34% of productivity growth (and thus carbon savings, or ∼36 tC/ha) to agricultural R&D and assuming that 70% of R&D is relevant to farm productivity gives a carbon price of $14.74 in AW1 and $27.43 in AW2 (per metric ton of carbon; plotted triangle).”
From Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification (2010) · cites this paper as [33]
Various estimates of factor productivity in agriculture estimate that research and development (R&D) accounts for around one-third of productivity growth.
“Various estimates of factor productivity in agriculture estimate that research and development (R&D) accounts for around one-third of productivity growth”
From Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification (2010) · cites this paper as [33]
Cites
The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity
Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., & Diewert, W. E. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913388 · Cited by 3,777 · see citing works
Exact and superlative index numbers
Diewert, W. E. (1976) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(76)90009-9 · Cited by 2,191 · see citing works
Productivity Growth in U.S. Agriculture: A Postwar Perspective
Jorgenson, D. W., & Gollop, F. M. (1992) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.2307/1242588 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Agricultural Research Productivity in PakistanPreprint
Azam, Q. T., Bloom, E., Evenson, R. E., et al. (1991) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.321325 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification
Burney, J. A., Davis, S. J., & Lobell, D. B. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0914216107 · Cited by 1,128 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rosegrant, M. W., & Evenson, R. E.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- ORCID
- Rosegrant, Mark W.
- Venue
- American Journal of Agricultural Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-08
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 757-761
- ISSN
- 0002-9092 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8276
- OpenAlex
- W1973620643
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 13.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Agricultural Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- IFPRI E-brary (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion)
- CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion)
- International Food Policy Research Institute (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Practices
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
- Keywords
- agricultural productivity, economic growth, sources of growth, South Asia, agricultural development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
