Cited by 90Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife EducationEnvironmental Philosophy and EthicsPhilosophy and History of Science

Science, Values, and Biodiversity

Dietz, Thomas, Stern, Paul C.·1998·BioScience

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1313241

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emerging technologies are like large-scale resource commons in complexity of choices, multidimensionality of risk, scientific uncertainty, value conflict and uncertainty, long time horizons, difficulty of excluding actors from taking action, high stakes, potential for mistrust, and time pressure.

    “Emerging technologies are like large-scale resource commons in the complexity of choices, multidimensionality of risk, scientific uncertainty, value conflict and uncertainty, long time horizons, difficulty of excluding actors from taking action, high stakes, potential for mistrust, and time pressure (Dietz and Stern 1998; National Research Council 2005; Stern et al. 2009).”

    From Design principles for global commons: natural resources and emerging technologies (2011) · cites this paper as Dietz and Stern 1998

  • Emerging technologies are like large-scale resource commons in the complexity of choices, multidimensionality of risk, scientific uncertainty, value conflict and uncertainty, long time horizons, difficulty of excluding actors from taking action, high stakes, potential for mistrust, and time pressure.

    “Emerging technologies are like large-scale resource commons in the complexity of choices, multidimensionality of risk, scientific uncertainty, value conflict and uncertainty, long time horizons, difficulty of excluding actors from taking action, high stakes, potential for mistrust, and time pressure (Dietz and Stern 1998; National Research Council 2005; Stern et al. 2009).”

    From Design principles for global commons: natural resources and emerging technologies (2011) · cites this paper as Dietz and Stern 1998

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dietz, T., & Stern, P. C.
Venue
BioScience
Published
1998-06
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
441-444
ISSN
  • 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3244
OpenAlex
W2340124918
Cited by
90
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
24.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
BioScience (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
biodiversity, science and values, conservation value, science-policy interface, biodiversity conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review