Cited by 63Literary Theory and Cultural HermeneuticsLiteracy and Educational PracticesLinguistics and Education Research

Texts, Readers, Reading Formations

Bennett, Tony·1983·The Bulletin of the Midwest Modern Language Association

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1314830

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Texts, readers, and the relations between them are all subject to variable determinations.

    “according to which “texts, readers, and the relations between them are all subject to variable determinations” (Bennett, 1983, p. 14).”

    From Methodology, Representation, and Games (2019) · cites this paper as Bennett, 1983

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bennett, T.
Corresponding author
Bennett, Tony
Venue
The Bulletin of the Midwest Modern Language Association
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1983
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
3
ISSN
0026-3419 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4231443575
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Bulletin of the Midwest Modern Language Association (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Linguistics and Education Research
Keywords
text, readers, reading formation, reading practices, reader-response criticism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review