Cited by 33Avian ecology and behaviorSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Altitudinal Variation in Bolivian Birds

Traylor, Melvin A.·1950·The Condor

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1364896

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intra- and interspecific comparisons of bird taxa suggest relatively larger wings at higher altitudes.

    “Intra-and interspecific comparisons of bird taxa suggest relatively larger wings at higher altitudes”

    From The physiology and biomechanics of avian flight at high altitude (2006) · cites this paper as Traylor, 1950

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Traylor, M. A.
Affiliations
Field Museum of Natural History (US)
Corresponding author
Traylor, Melvin A.
Venue
The Condor
Published
1950-05
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
123-126
ISSN
  • 0010-5422 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-5129
OpenAlex
W2312541193
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ornithological Applications (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
altitudinal variation, birds, bird distribution, elevation gradient, Andes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review