Cited by 40Wildlife Ecology and ConservationRangeland and Wildlife ManagementAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Elk Situation

Skinner, M. P.·1928·Journal of Mammalogy

Abstract

Journal Article The Elk Situation Get access M. P. Skinner M. P. Skinner Jamestown, New York Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of Mammalogy, Volume 9, Issue 4, November 1928, Pages 309–317, https://doi.org/10.2307/1374085 Published: 01 November 1928

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1374085

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 40

Metadata

Authors
Skinner, M. P.
Corresponding author
Skinner, M. P.
Venue
Journal of Mammalogy
Published
1928-11
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
309
ISSN
0022-2372 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2326266482
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Mammalogy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
elk, wildlife management, game management, population control, New York State

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review