The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of Asymmetrical Gaits
Abstract
Asymmetrical gaits (that is, gallops and bounds) have the footfalls of a pair of feet unevenly spaced in time. Such gaits were studied from slow motion film for 79 genera. All information about the timing of events at the ground can be expressed by five variables. Foot contact intervals range from 16 to 70 percent of the cycle. Fore and hind contacts are nearly equal for most ungulates and carnivores; fore contacts are the shorter for most rodents and rabbits. Fore contacts are proportionately shorter at higher speeds. The size of the fore lead is less than the hind for some apes; fore and hind leads are about equal for many carnivores and ungulates; fore leads are the longer for most mammals-particularly for smaller, more agile genera when moving fast. Actions of the forefeet as a pair are related to those of the hind feet by “midtime lag.” When this variable is plotted against the percentage duration of ground contact by one or both hind feet, a basic gait graph is derived on which are distinguished gaits with no suspensions, with a gathered suspension, an extended suspension, and both suspensions. The distribution of plots on the graph also correlates roughly with body size, maneuverability, and lead sequence (that is, transverse, rotary, half bound, or bound). A terminology of asymmetrical gaits is presented. The distribution on the graph of 104 identified footfall formulas is shown, and formulas characteristic of 55 genera are depicted. Asymmetrical gaits probably evolved, in amphibians and several times in reptiles, to benefit escape. Gaits with short leads or none, and an extended suspension are considered primitive. All lead sequences evolved early.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Gaits of Bipedal and Quadrupedal Animals
Alexander, R. M. (1984) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/027836498400300205 · Cited by 411
The Quadrupedal Gaits of Vertebrates
Hildebrand, M. (1989) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1311182 · Cited by 269
Self-citationElastic structures in the back and their rôle in galloping in some mammals
Alexander, R. M., Dimery, N. J., & Ker, R. F. (1985) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1985.tb04944.x · Cited by 258
Effects of early-stage aging on locomotor dynamics and hindlimb muscle force production in the rat
Horner, A. M., Russ, D. W., & Biknevicius, A. R. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.055087 · Cited by 26
Distribution, morphology, and natural history observations of the Colombian weasel, Neogale felipei
Ramírez-Chaves, H. E., Cardona Giraldo, A., Henao-Osorio, J. J., Bueno-Cano, L., Marín Rojas, A. F., Tamayo-Zuluaga, A. F., Ospina-Pérez, E. M., Pisso-Flórez, G. A., Echeverry-Pérez, J. S., & Rivera-Páez, F. A. (2024) · Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment · doi:10.1080/01650521.2024.2375931 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Hildebrand, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Mammalogy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1977-05-31
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 131-156
- ISSN
- 0022-2372 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1542
- OpenAlex
- W2104628675
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of Asymmetrical Gaits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1379571
- The paper
- Hildebrand, M. (1977). Analysis of Asymmetrical Gaits. Journal of Mammalogy. https://doi.org/10.2307/1379571
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.