The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sexual-Size Dimorphism: Influence of Mass and Mating Systems in the Most Dimorphic Mammals
Abstract
I examined influence of body size and mating systems on sexual-size dimorphism by summarizing characteristics and testing for associations among the most dimorphic mammalian taxa—Macropodidae, Primates, Mustelidae, Pinnipedia, Elephantidae, Ruminantia. The most dimorphic taxa were seals in Otariidae. On average, males were three times larger than females, and all otariids displayed extensive dimorphism. Except for the Strepsirhini, most taxa had dimorphism ratios (mass of males:mass of females) between 1.2–1.8. Extent of dimorphism increased with body size but the effect was slight (power function between masses of males and females, 1.04–1.05) for most taxa. Phocid seals and macropodid marsupials had power functions of ca. 1.2. Mating systems were associated with size dimorphism in simian primates and ruminants. Monogamous simian primates were less dimorphic than simians that had polygynous mating systems. Ruminants with tending and harem mating systems were more dimorphic than those with territorial polygynous and monogamous mating systems. Polygyny and how it was conducted were associated with the extent of sexual size dimorphism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Determinants of Variation in Tropical Forest Primate Biomass: New Evidence from West Africa
Oates, J. F., Whitesides, G. H., Davies, A. G., Waterman, P. G., Green, S. M., Dasilva, G. L., & Mole, S. (1990) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1940272 · Cited by 334
Cited by
Sexual size dimorphism in birds
Székely, T., Lislevand, T., & Figuerola, J. (2007) · Sex, Size and Gender Roles · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199208784.003.0004 · Cited by 160
Evolution of ungulate mating systems: Integrating social and environmental factors
Bowyer, R. T., McCullough, D. R., Rachlow, J. L., Ciuti, S., & Whiting, J. C. (2020) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.6246 · Cited by 87
Iossa, G., Soulsbury, C. D., Baker, P. J., & Harris, S. (2008) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1644/07-mamm-a-405.1 · Cited by 62
Stepkovitch, B., Martin, J. M., Dickman, C. R., & Welbergen, J. A. (2019) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/jzo.12723 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Weckerly, F. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Mammalogy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-02-20
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-52
- ISSN
- 0022-2372 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1542
- OpenAlex
- W2322650855
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sexual-Size Dimorphism: Influence of Mass and Mating Systems in the Most Dimorphic Mammals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1382840
- The paper
- Weckerly, F. W. (1998). Sexual-Size Dimorphism: Influence of Mass and Mating Systems in the Most Dimorphic Mammals. Journal of Mammalogy. https://doi.org/10.2307/1382840
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.