Cited by 75Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyNonprofit Sector and VolunteeringReligion and Society Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Impact of Devotionalism and Attendance on Ordinary and Emergency Helping Behavior

Nelson, L. D., Dynes, Russell R.·1976·Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

Abstract

L. D. Nelson, Russell R. Dynes, The Impact of Devotionalism and Attendance on Ordinary and Emergency Helping Behavior, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 15, No. 1 (Mar., 1976), pp. 47-59

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1384313

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nelson, L. D., & Dynes, R. R.
Venue
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1976-03
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
47
ISSN
0021-8294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2320707121
Cited by
75
References
38
Citations by year
2023: 41 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
devotionalism, religious service attendance, helping behavior, prosocial behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review