Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 842

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk and Religion: An Explanation of Gender Differences in Religiosity

Miller, Alan S., Hoffmann, John P.·1995·Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

Abstract

Gender differences in religiosity are well known. Past studies have consistently shown that females tend to be more religious than males. We propose that gender differences in risk preferences are related to differences in religiosity. Building on the classic concept of "Pascal's wager," we conceive of religious behavior as risk averse and nonreligious behavior as risk taking. Analysis of data from the Monitoring the Future data set shows that the addition of risk preference strongly attenuates gender differences in religiosity. Risk preference also is a significant predictor of religiosity within each gender. Implications of this study are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1386523

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 842

Metadata

Authors
Miller, A. S., & Hoffmann, J. P.
Venue
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1995-03
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
63
ISSN
0021-8294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2323811641
Cited by
842
References
2
FWCI
7.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk and Religion: An Explanation of Gender Differences in Religiosity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1386523
The paper
Miller, A. S., & Hoffmann, J. P. (1995). Risk and Religion: An Explanation of Gender Differences in Religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386523

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.