Cited by 618Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsHealth disparities and outcomes

Religious attendance increases survival by improving and maintaining good health behaviors, mental health, and social relationships

Strawbridge, William J., Shema, Sarah J., Cohen, Richard D., Kaplan, George A.·2001·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Several recent prospective analyses involving community-based populations have demonstrated a protective effect on survival for frequent attendance at religious services. How such involvement increases survival are unclear. To test the hypothesis that religious attendance might serve to improve and maintain good health behaviors, mental health, and social relationships, changes and consistencies in these variables were studied between 1965 and 1994 for 2,676 Alameda County Study participants, from 17 to 65 years of age in 1965, who survived to 1994. Measures included smoking, physical activity, alcohol consumption, medical checkups, depression, social interactions, and marital status. Those reporting weekly religious attendance in 1965 were more likely to both improve poor health behaviors and maintain good ones by 1994 than were those whose attendance was less or none. Weekly attendance was also associated with improving and maintaining good mental health, increased social relationships, and marital stability. Results were stronger for women in improving poor health behaviors and mental health, consistent with known gender differences in associations between religious attendance and survival. Further understanding the mechanisms involved could aid health promotion and intervention efforts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15324796abm2301_10

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 178 highest-rigor studies on R/S and depression, 119 (67%) reported inverse relationships and 13 (7%) found positive relationships with depression.

    “Of the 178 studies with the highest methodological rigor, 119 (67%) reported inverse relationships [124–135] and 13 (7%) found positive relationships with depression [136–148].”
  • Of the 38 methodologically most rigorous marital instability studies, 35 (92%) reported significant relationships between R/S and greater marital stability.

    “Of the 38 methodologically most rigorous studies, 35 (92%) reported significant relationships between R/S and greater marital stability [255–265].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Strawbridge, W. J., Shema, S. J., Cohen, R. D., & Kaplan, G. A.
Affiliations
  • Human Population Laboratory (US)
  • Cancer Prevention Institute of California (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Strawbridge, William J.
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2001-02
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
68-74
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W1970973092
Cited by
618
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 31
FWCI
15.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Institute on Aging (R37AG011375, 1R37 AG-11375)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
religious service attendance, survival, health behavior, mental health, interpersonal relationships, marital stability, smoking, physical activity, alcohol consumption, medical check-ups, depression, gender differences, Alameda County Study, health promotion
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, California, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Life Style, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Religion and Psychology, Health Behavior, Odds Ratio, Marital Status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review