CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1Indian and Buddhist StudiesStudy and Philosophy of ReligionPhilosophy and Historical Thought

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Early Buddhism and John Stuart Mill's Thinking in the Fields of Philosophy and Religion: Some Notes toward a Comparative Study

Rajapakse, Vijitha·1987·Philosophy East and West
DOI 10.2307/1398519
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Vijitha Rajapakse, Early Buddhism and John Stuart Mill's Thinking in the Fields of Philosophy and Religion: Some Notes toward a Comparative Study, Philosophy East and West, Vol. 37, No. 3 (Jul., 1987), pp. 260-285

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1398519

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Rajapakse, V.
Corresponding author
Rajapakse, Vijitha
Venue
Philosophy East and West
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1987-07
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
260
ISSN
0031-8221 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2307/1398519
OpenAlex
W2315554476
Cited by
1
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Philosophy East and West (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Historical Thought
Keywords
early Buddhism, John Stuart Mill, comparative philosophy, comparative religion, Buddhist philosophy, utilitarianism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early Buddhism and John Stuart Mill's Thinking in the Fields of Philosophy and Religion: Some Notes toward a Comparative Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1398519
The paper
Rajapakse, V. (1987). Early Buddhism and John Stuart Mill's Thinking in the Fields of Philosophy and Religion: Some Notes toward a Comparative Study. Philosophy East and West. https://doi.org/10.2307/1398519