The Bodhisattva Doctrine in Buddhism
Abstract
Har Dayal's The Bodhisattva Doctrine in Buddhist Sanskrit Literature published in 1931 was the first extensive study in English of the Bodhisattva doctrine. Dayal discussed the Bodhisattva doctrine as it was expounded in the Buddhist Sanskrit texts, and it remains a question whether anything more can be added to his excellent study. However, no other book on the doctrine has appeared in English subsequent to Dayal's study, and Buddhist scholarship, having expanded beyond the boundaries of the Sanskrit language, must now take into account information found not only in the Sanskrit language but also in other languages fundamental to Buddhist studies. In order to investigate what current research in Sanskrit, Tibetan, Chinese, and Japanese materials could contribute to the study of the Bodhisattva doctrine, the Department of Religious Studies at the University of Calgary planned a conference around the theme of the Bodhisattva. The papers presented in this volume were first read and discussed at the conference.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
After Zhizang argued against it, Emperor Wu dropped his plan to become Lay Rectifier of Monks.
“In the end, however, Emperor Wu had to admit defeat to Zhizang's arguments and he subsequently abandoned the whole idea of becoming a lay Rectifier of Monks.20”
From Monks for Hire (2011) · cites this paper as [20]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rauw, T. D., & Heirman, A. (2011) · The Medieval History Journal · doi:10.1177/097194581001400103 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Koseki, A. K., & Kawamura, L. S.
- Venue
- Philosophy East and West
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1984-10
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 461
- ISSN
- 0031-8221 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026235906
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Philosophy East and West (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
- Keywords
- Tibetan Buddhism, Chinese Buddhism, Japanese Buddhism, Buddhist studies, Mahayana Buddhism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review