The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of Survival Data under the Proportional Hazards Model
Abstract
Summary Methodology is reviewed for the statistical analysis of censored survival data which arise from a model in which the factors under investigation act multiplicatively on the hazard function of an underlying nonparametric survival distribution. This flexible approach provides computationally feasible solutions to the following problems: (i) one-sample problem (relative death rate); (ii) multi-sample problem; (iii) regression with continuous covariates; (iv) regression in matched-pair designs; (v) evaluation of changes in treatment or prognostic status (time dependent covariates). For the multi-sample problem with stratification, numerical results are presented contrasting maximum likelihood with simple chi-square analyses. While several of the methods described have been used on an ad hoc basis for many years, study of their common theoretical underpinnings has commenced only recently. This paper reviews a general methodology for the statistical analysis of survival or response time data such as accrue from the long-term follow-up of patients with chronic disease. The theoretical basis for this methodology is the assumption that prognostic or treatment factors under investigation have multiplicative effects on the hazard (instantaneous death rate) function of an underlying survival distribution. No particular parametric form is
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease
(1959) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/22.4.719 · Cited by 14,689
Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 Tests
Cochran, W. G. (1954) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001616 · Cited by 3,718
Asymptotically Efficient Rank Invariant Test Procedures
Peto, R., & Peto, J. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344317 · Cited by 3,393
Cited by
Slamon, D. J., Clark, G. M., Wong, S. G., Levin, W. J., Ullrich, A., & McGuire, W. L. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3798106 · Cited by 11,760
Peto, R., Pike, M. C., Armitage, P., Breslow, N. E., Cox, D. R., Howard, S. V., Mantel, N., McPherson, K., Peto, J., & Smith, P. G. (1977) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1977.1 · Cited by 8,285
Self-citationPeto, R., Pike, M. C., Armitage, P., Breslow, N. E., Cox, D. R., Howard, S. V., Mantel, N., McPherson, K., Peto, J., & Smith, P. G. (1976) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1976.220 · Cited by 2,294
Self-citationIntroduction to sample size determination and power analysis for clinical trials
Lachin, J. M. (1981) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(81)90001-5 · Cited by 1,012
CXCR6 positions cytotoxic T cells to receive critical survival signals in the tumor microenvironment
Di Pilato, M., Kfuri-Rubens, R., Pruessmann, J. N., Ozga, A. J., Messemaker, M., Cadilha, B. L., Sivakumar, R., Cianciaruso, C., Warner, R. D., Marangoni, F., et al. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.07.015 · Cited by 488
Metadata
- Authors
- Breslow, N. E.
- Venue
- International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1975-04
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45
- ISSN
- 0306-7734 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2324805613
- Cited by
- 590
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of Survival Data under the Proportional Hazards Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1402659
- The paper
- Breslow, N. E. (1975). Analysis of Survival Data under the Proportional Hazards Model. International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique. https://doi.org/10.2307/1402659
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.