The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Discrimination of Visual Number
Abstract
Suppose that there are two collections or groups of objects-coins, trees, beans, or aircraft-and we do not know how many objects there are. Suppose further that for some reason we cannot count the number of objects in either group. Still, some property of each group makes it possible for a person to say that one of these groups is greater-than, lessthan, or equal-to the other group. It is this property of a collection of objects that we define as numerousness.l We might say that numerousness is that property of a group of objects which we can discriminate, without counting, under instruction to judge how many objects the group contains. We shall wish to modify this definition later as a result of the experiments reported in this paper, but it is adequate for the present discussion of the problem. The judgment of 'numerousness' may be made in several different ways: (a) it may be comparative-more numerous or less numerous, larger or smaller, etc.; (b) or it may be 'absolute.' There is one special form that the absolute judgment of numerousness can take. It is called the direct reporting of number. In this method of reporting, a numeral is assigned to represent how many things there are in any given collection of objects. After a brief look-so brief that counting is impossible-we say 10, 23, or 250 to indicate that we estimate that the group contained 10, 23, or 250 members.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
Action video game modifies visual selective attention
Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01647 · Cited by 2,540
Memory span: Sources of individual and developmental differences.
Dempster, F. N. (1981) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.89.1.63 · Cited by 587
Enumeration versus multiple object tracking: the case of action video game players
Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2006) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.10.004 · Cited by 560
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M. W., Reese, T. W., & Volkmann, J.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- University of Illinois Press
- Published
- 1949-10
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 498
- ISSN
- 0002-9556 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2333080640
- Cited by
- 1,173
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Discrimination of Visual Number. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1418556
- The paper
- Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M. W., Reese, T. W., & Volkmann, J. (1949). The Discrimination of Visual Number. The American Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1418556
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.