Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 194

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Sweetness and Pleasantness of Sugars

Moskowitz, Howard R.·1971·The American Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Nine experiments were run to assess the relation between sweetness, pleasantness, and the concentrations of 43 sugars. A power function adequately related the sweetness, S, of most sugars to their concentration, C: S = kCn, where the intercept k is a measure of relative sweetness. The average exponent is about 1.3, and the results suggest that the large range of relative sweetness across sugars is correlated with differences in molecular structure. The pleasantness of sugars was not monotonic with concentration but systematically departed from linearity at high concentrations. Pleasantness as a function of sweetness was roughly linear in log-log coordinates, with a slope between .3 and .5.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1420470

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 194

Metadata

Authors
Moskowitz, H. R.
Venue
The American Journal of Psychology
Published
1971-09
Volume
84
Issue
3
Pages
387
ISSN
0002-9556 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2326800113
Cited by
194
References
0
FWCI
8.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Sweetness and Pleasantness of Sugars. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1420470
The paper
Moskowitz, H. R. (1971). The Sweetness and Pleasantness of Sugars. The American Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1420470

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.