Cited by 274Biochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Sucrose activates human taste pathways differently from artificial sweetener

Frank, Guido K.W., Oberndorfer, Tyson A., Simmons, Alan N., Paulus, Martin P., Fudge, Julie L., Yang, Tony T., Kaye, Walter H.·2008·NeuroImage

Abstract

Animal models suggest that sucrose activates taste afferents differently than non-caloric sweeteners. Little information exists how artificial sweeteners engage central taste pathways in the human brain. We assessed sucrose and sucralose taste pleasantness across a concentration gradient in 12 healthy control women and applied 10% sucrose and matched sucralose during functional magnet resonance imaging. The results indicate that (1) both sucrose and sucralose activate functionally connected primary taste pathways; (2) taste pleasantness predicts left insula response; (3) sucrose elicits a stronger brain response in the anterior insula, frontal operculum, striatum and anterior cingulate, compared to sucralose; (4) only sucrose, but not sucralose, stimulation engages dopaminergic midbrain areas in relation to the behavioral pleasantness response. Thus, brain response distinguishes the caloric from the non-caloric sweetener, although the conscious mind could not. This could have important implications on how effective artificial sweeteners are in their ability to substitute sugar intake.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.061

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human imaging studies have shown that tasting palatable foods activated the insula and midbrain areas.

    “Human imaging studies have shown that tasting palatable foods activated the insula and midbrain areas (143,144).”

    From Obesity and addiction: Neurobiological overlaps (2013) · cites this paper as [144]

  • When normal-weight women tasted a sweetener with calories (sucrose), both the insula and dopaminergic midbrain areas became activated, whereas tasting a calorie-free sweetener (sucralose) only activated the insula.

    “For example, when normal-weight women tasted a sweetener with calories (sucrose), both the insula and dopaminergic midbrain areas became activated, whereas tasting a calorie-free sweetener (sucralose) only activated the insula (144).”

    From Obesity and addiction: Neurobiological overlaps (2013) · cites this paper as [144]

  • When normal weight women tasted sucrose, both insula and DA midbrain areas activated, whereas sucralose only activated the insula.

    “For example, when normal weight women tasted a sweetener with calories (sucrose), both the insula and DA midbrain areas became activated, whereas tasting a calorie-free sweetener (sucralose) only activated the insula (103).”

    From The Addictive Dimensionality of Obesity (2013) · cites this paper as [103]

  • In humans, tasting palatable foods activated the insula and midbrain areas.

    “Indeed, in humans, tasting palatable foods activated the insula and midbrain areas (102,103).”

    From The Addictive Dimensionality of Obesity (2013) · cites this paper as [103]

  • Human imaging studies have shown that tasting palatable foods activated the insula and midbrain areas.

    “Human imaging studies have shown that tasting palatable foods activated the insula and midbrain areas (DelParigi et al 2005;Frank et al 2008).”

    From Food and Drug Reward: Overlapping Circuits in Human Obesity and Addiction (2011) · cites this paper as Frank et al 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frank, G. K. W., Oberndorfer, T. A., Simmons, A. N., Paulus, M. P., Fudge, J. L., Yang, T. T., & Kaye, W. H.
Affiliations
  • Children's Hospital Colorado (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Kaye, Walter H.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-02
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
1559-1569
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083215956
Cited by
274
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000005)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
sucrose, sucralose, artificial sweeteners, taste pleasantness, anterior insula, frontal operculum, striatum, anterior cingulate cortex, dopaminergic midbrain, functional connectivity, sugar substitution
MeSH terms
Adult, Afferent Pathways, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Dopamine, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Reward, Sucrose, Sweetening Agents, Taste, Taste Buds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review