Cited by 360Twentieth Century Scientific DevelopmentsResearch, Science, and AcademiaPolitical Economy and Marxism

Population, resources, and the ideology of science

Harvey, David·1974·Economic Geography

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/142863

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harvey, D.
Corresponding author
Harvey, David
Venue
Economic Geography
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1974-07
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
256
ISSN
0013-0095 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4239785604
Cited by
360
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
12.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Economic Geography (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Twentieth Century Scientific Developments
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
Keywords
population, natural resources, ideology of science, science and society, resource constraints, population growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review