The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Human Territoriality. Its Theory and History
Abstract
Introduction 1. The meaning of territoriality 2. Theory 3. Historical models: territoriality, space, and time 4. The church 5. The American territorial system 6. The work place 7. Conclusion: society, territory, and space Indices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory
Agnew, J. (1994) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692299408434268 · Cited by 2,549
Elden, S. (2010) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132510362603 · Cited by 707
Reconfiguring frontier spaces: The territorialization of resource control
Rasmussen, M. B., & Lund, C. (2018) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.018 · Cited by 566
Sewell, G., & Taskin, L. (2015) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840615593587 · Cited by 369
A new conceptualization of ethnicity for social epidemiologic and health equity research
Ford, C. L., & Harawa, N. T. (2010) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.008 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Malmberg, T., & Sack, R. D.
- Venue
- Economic Geography
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1988-04
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 194
- ISSN
- 0013-0095 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060574593
- Cited by
- 1,222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human Territoriality. Its Theory and History. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/144126
- The paper
- Malmberg, T., & Sack, R. D. (1988). Human Territoriality. Its Theory and History. Economic Geography. https://doi.org/10.2307/144126
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
