Cited by 91Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsFish Biology and Ecology StudiesEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Chromosomal Evolution in North American Catfishes (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae) with Particular Emphasis on the Madtoms, Noturus

LeGrande, William Hunt·1981·Copeia

Abstract

William Hunt LeGrande, Chromosomal Evolution in North American Catfishes (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae) with Particular Emphasis on the Madtoms, Noturus, Copeia, Vol. 1981, No. 1 (Feb. 10, 1981), pp. 33-52

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1444039

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LeGrande, W. H.
Corresponding author
LeGrande, William Hunt
Venue
Copeia
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1981-02-10
Volume
1981
Issue
1
Pages
33
ISSN
0045-8511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2323516385
Cited by
91
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Copeia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
karyotype evolution, catfish, Ictaluridae, karyotype, North American freshwater fishes, cytogenetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review