Cited by 4melanin and skin pigmentationGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesChromosomal and Genetic Variations

Chromosome-level genome assembly of the glass catfish (Kryptopterus vitreolus) reveals molecular clues to its transparent phenotype

Open access
Bian, Chao, 深圳大学生命与海洋科学学院水产基因组学实验室, 广东 深圳 518057, 中国, Laboratory of Aquatic Genomics, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518057, China, Li, Rui-Han, Ruan, Zhi-Qiang, Chen, Wei-Ting, Huang, Yu, Liu, Li-Yue +20 more·2024·Zoological Research

Abstract

Glass catfish (Kryptopterus vitreolus) is a popular aquarium fish due to its extremely transparent body pattern. Its main body loses most of the reflective iridophores and light-absorbing melanophores, although its face and head retain certain black and iridescent iridophores. So far, molecular mechanisms of this transparent phenotype have been largely unknown yet. To identify some potential genetic clues to this fascinated transparence, we constructed a chromosome-level haplotypic genome assembly for the glass catfish with 32 chromosomes and 23,344 protein-coding genes by integration of PacBio and Hi-C sequencing technologies and a series of standard assembly and annotation pipelines. Meanwhile, we identified a premature stop codon in the putative albinism-related tyrp1b gene (encoding tyrosinase-related protein 1), thereby leading it to be a nonfunctional pseudogene. Interestingly, we also identified loss of endothelin-3 (edn3b) gene in the glass catfish genome by synteny comparison with over 30 other fish species. We then generated edn3b-/- mutant zebrafish and observed a remarkable decrease of black pigments in body surface stripes when compared to the wild zebrafish. That is to say, the loss of edn3b gene was validated to make contribution in part to the transparent phenotype of glass catfish. We established a high-quality chromosome-scale genome assembly for glass catfish, as well as identified several important genes with molecular clues to the transparent phenotype. Our current findings not only enhance our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the transparent phenotype of glass catfish, but also offer a valuable genetic resource for in-depth investigations on pigmentation of various animals.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper presents a chromosome-level genome assembly of the glass catfish and identifies a premature stop codon in tyrp1b plus loss of edn3b as molecular clues to its transparent phenotype. CRISPR-Cas9 edn3b−/− zebrafish showed reduced black and silver pigments, supporting edn3b loss as a contributor to transparency.

Key findings

  • The de novo assembly was 652.4 Mb with a contig N50 of 1.2 Mb; 634.7 Mb (97.1%) was anchored to 32 chromosomes, with a scaffold N50 of 22.5 Mb, BUSCO completeness of 90.3%, and 23,344 protein-coding genes, of which 22,537 (96.5%) had functional annotations.
  • The glass catfish tyrp1b gene contains a premature stop codon in its first exon, likely making it a nonfunctional pseudogene.
  • Synteny comparisons with over 30 other fish species identified loss of edn3b in the glass catfish; edn3b−/− zebrafish exhibited a remarkable reduction in black pigments in body surface stripes, with stripe patterns breaking into circular spots or disappearing, and a mutation ratio of 30.3% (33/109).
  • The glass catfish genome had 277 expanded and 1,034 contracted gene families; it was closest to Chinese large-mouth catfish, with divergence estimated at approximately 42.3 Ma, and had the highest haplotypic chromosome number (32) among representative catfish species.

Methods

  • A female glass catfish (2.0 g) collected from a local market in Guangzhou, China, was used for genomic DNA from muscle; sequencing included seven Illumina libraries, PacBio long reads, Hi-C, and transcriptome sequencing, under BGI ethics approval FT18134.
  • Genome assembly used Platanus, DBG2OLC, Pilon, and SSPACE-LongReads, with BUSCO for completeness; Hi-C reads were processed with Juicer and 3D-DNA to construct chromosomes; repeats and genes were annotated using RepeatModeler, RepeatMasker, homology-based and transcriptome-based predictions merged with MAKER.
  • Comparative analyses used 12 representative species for OrthoMCL gene family clustering, PhyML phylogeny, PAML MCMCtree divergence dating, and CAFE gene family expansion/contraction; ancestral catfish karyotypes were reconstructed from 10 catfish species; CRISPR-Cas9 was used to generate edn3b−/− zebrafish with a gRNA targeting exon 2.

Limitations

  • Not stated in the paper: the paper does not include a dedicated limitations section.
  • Evident from the text: the genome assembly is based on a single female individual, so population-level and sex-specific variation are not assessed.
  • Evident from the text: the functional link between tyrp1b loss and transparency is inferred from sequence analysis rather than direct experimental validation in glass catfish, and the edn3b knockout was performed in zebrafish, not in the glass catfish itself.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2023.396

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

4 of 13 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingown data

    The 12 representative catfish species diverged from zebrafish approximately 173.5 million years ago, later than the divergence time reported in the blue catfish genome study.

    “Based on the maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree, the 12 representative catfish species diverged from zebrafish approximately 173.5 million years ago (Ma), which is later than the divergence time reported in the blue catfish genome study (Wang et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al., 2022 source
  • Interpretationcitation

    Both Siluriformes and Cypriniformes may share similar chromosomal rearrangements.

    “Some of these rearrangements were similar to those observed in zebrafish (Bian et al., 2016), implying that both Siluriformes and Cypriniformes may share similar chromosomal rearrangements.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bian et al., 2016 source
  • Findingown data

    The edn3b gene is lost in the glass catfish genome, as identified by synteny comparison with over 30 other fish species.

    “a synteny comparison with over 30 other fish species identified the loss of the endothelin-3 (edn3b) gene in the glass catfish genome.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    BUSCO analysis showed 90.3% completeness of the glass catfish genome assembly.

    “The BUSCO results showed 90.3% completeness (Supplementary Table S5), demonstrating that the glass catfish genome assembly covered most genetic regions with relatively high completeness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The 12 representative catfish species were divided into two main clades.

    “These species were divided into two main clades (Figure 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 11
  • May combine two claims. 15
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    The phenotype of edn3b−/− mutant zebrafish was consistent with previous findings.

    “The phenotype of edn3b−/− mutants was consistent with previous findings (Spiewak et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Spiewak et al., 2018 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The chromosome karyotypes of various catfish species exhibit a range of diploid numbers (2n) from 2n=40 to 2n=62.

    “the chromosome karyotypes of various catfish species exhibit a range of diploid numbers (2n) from 2n=40 to 2n=62 (de MC Sassi et al., 2020; Legrande, 1981).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites de MC Sassi et al., 2020 source

      The Introduction and Discussion §4.1 (pages unavailable) describe variation in diploid number among Harttia catfishes and give an upper value of 2n = 62. They give the lower value as 2n = 52 in females and 53 in males, not 40; the cited paper therefore does not support the claimed lower endpoint. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Legrande, 1981 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Approximately 269.4 Gb of Illumina raw reads were generated, and 182.7 Gb of clean reads were obtained after filtering.

    “Approximately 269.4 Gb of Illumina raw reads from seven libraries were generated. After a series of filtering steps, 182.7 Gb of clean reads were obtained (Supplementary Table S1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    15.1 Gb of raw reads were produced using the PacBio platform.

    “In addition, 15.1 Gb of raw reads were produced using the PacBio platform (Supplementary Table S2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The de novo genome assembly of the glass catfish was 652.4 Mb, with a contig N50 of 1.2 Mb.

    “After assembling the combined Illumina and PacBio reads, a de novo genome assembly of 652.4 Mb was obtained, with a contig N50 of 1.2 Mb (Supplementary Table S4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The core peak of the k-mer depth was 49, with a total 17-mer number of 31,494,249,372.

    “The core peak of the k-mer depth was 49, with a total 17-mer number of 31 494 249 372 (Supplementary Figure S1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The mutation ratio of recovered edn3b−/− mosaics was 30.3% (33/109).

    “Recovered mosaics (edn3b−/−) were identified by sequencing the genomic DNA of examined fish, yielding a mutation ratio of 30.3% (33/109).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The glass catfish showed the closest relationship to the Chinese large-mouth catfish (Silurus meridionalis), with a predicted divergence time of approximately 42.3 million years ago.

    “The glass catfish showed the closest relationship to the Chinese large-mouth catfish, belonging to the family of Siluridae, with a predicted divergence time of approximately 42.3 Ma.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The 23,344 genes contained an average of 9.7 exons, each with an average length of approximately 175.0 bp.

    “These genes contained an average of 9.7 exons, each with an average length of approximately 175.0 bp.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    LINE, SINE, and LTR sequences accounted for 5.2%, 7.1%, and 7.0% of the total repeats, respectively.

    “Long interspersed nuclear element (LINE), short terminal repeated element (SINE), and long terminal repeat (LTR) sequences accounted for 5.2%, 7.1%, and 7.0% of the total repeats, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A total of 25,404 orthologous gene families were identified from 15 representative species, including glass catfish, with 2,904 single-copy orthologs used to establish the phylogenetic topology and divergence time tree.

    “A total of 25 404 orthologous gene families were identified from 15 representative species, including glass catfish (Supplementary Table S10), with 2 904 single-copy orthologs genes used to establish the phylogenetic topology and divergence time tree (Figure 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    146.6 Gb of raw reads were sequenced from the Hi-C library, and 137.3 Gb of clean data were generated.

    “For chromosome construction, 146.6 Gb of raw reads from the Hi-C library were sequenced. After filtering, 137.3 Gb of clean data were generated for the HiC-Pro pipeline.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    DNA repeat sequences were the predominant type, accounting for 25.5% of the total repeats.

    “Among these, DNA repeat sequences were the predominant type, accounting for 25.5% of the total repeats.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    634.7 Mb of contigs were anchored to 32 chromosomes, accounting for 97.1% of the total assembled genome.

    “Finally, 634.7 Mb of contigs were anchored to 32 chromosomes (Chr; Figure 1B; Supplementary Table S6), accounting for 97.1% of the total assembled genome.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Some sublineages developed 30 chromosomes through fissions, while others evolved reduced chromosome karyotypes by continuous chromosomal fusions.

    “However, some sublineages developed 30 chromosomes through fissions, while others evolved reduced chromosome karyotypes by continuous chromosomal fusions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The reconstruction yielded 29 ancestral chromosomes with nine major rearrangements, including five fissions, three fusions, and a complex rearrangement involving both fissions and translocations.

    “The reconstruction yielded 29 ancestral chromosomes (Figure 3A) with nine major rearrangements, including five fissions, three fusions, and a complex rearrangement involving both fissions and translocations (the translocations of three original chromosomes to five rearranged chromosomes are marked in red boxes in Figure 3A).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The chromosome-level haplotypic genome assembly of the glass catfish has 32 chromosomes and 23,344 protein-coding genes.

    “We constructed a chromosome-level haplotypic genome assembly with 32 chromosomes and 23 344 protein-coding genes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Three active chromosomal segments were identified as the most unstable, including the light blue segment of Chr30, light purple segment of Chr25, and gray & dark purple segment of Chr2 in striped catfish.

    “Moreover, three active chromosomal segments were identified as the most unstable, including the light blue segment of Chr30, light purple segment of Chr25, and gray & dark purple segment of Chr2 in striped catfish (see Figure 3I).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Two different translocations were observed in the five fish species with 29 chromosomes, which were closest to the ancestral catfish karyotype, although the black bullhead catfish exhibited two extra fissions and two fusions.

    “Two different translocations were observed in the five fish species with 29 chromosomes (Figure 3D, F, H, K, L), which were closest to the ancestral catfish karyotype, although the black bullhead catfish exhibited two extra fissions and two fusions (Figure 3F).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Review Board on Bioethics and Biosafety of BGI (approval ID: FT18134).

    “All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Review Board on Bioethics and Biosafety of BGI (approval ID: FT18134).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The gRNA targeting the second exon of zebrafish edn3b (GGAACCACCAGAGAAGAC) was confirmed to be unique in the zebrafish genome.

    “A gRNA targeting the second exon was designed with the sequence GGAACCACCAGAGAAGAC, confirmed to be unique in the zebrafish genome for subsequent amplification from the wild-type zebrafish.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Double knockdown of tyrp1a and tyrp1b in zebrafish mutants is reported to produce hypo-pigmented melanophores and brown coloration instead of black eumelanin.

    “Double knockdown of tyrp1a and tyrp1b in zebrafish mutants is reported to produce hypo-pigmented melanophores and brown coloration instead of black eumelanin (Braasch et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Braasch et al., 2009 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    These findings are consistent with previous reports.

    “These findings are consistent with previous reports (De Oliveira et al., 2009; Legrande, 1981).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites De Oliveira et al., 2009 source
    • cites Legrande, 1981 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Black eumelanin formation relies on the presence of tyrp1, a function likely conserved from the common ancestor of bony vertebrates.

    “Black eumelanin formation relies on the presence of tyrp1, a function likely conserved from the common ancestor of bony vertebrates (Braasch et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Braasch et al., 2009 source
24 of 24
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No genome sequences of the glass catfish have been published.

    “To the best of our knowledge, no genome sequences of the glass catfish have been published.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The transparency of glass catfish is due to the loss of most reflective iridophores and light-absorbing melanophores in the main body, with certain black and silver pigments remaining in the face and head.

    “This transparency is due to the loss of most reflective iridophores and light-absorbing melanophores in the main body, although certain black and silver pigments remain in the face and head.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The role of edn3b in pigmentation is conserved between zebrafish and glass catfish.

    “These findings indicate that edn3b loss contributes to the transparent phenotype of the glass catfish.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The molecular mechanisms underlying the transparent phenotype of glass catfish remain largely unknown.

    “To date, however, the molecular mechanisms underlying this transparent phenotype remain largely unknown.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The silver pigment synthesis pathway remains unclear.

    “As the silver pigment synthesis pathway remains unclear, we compiled a list of iridophore development-related genes from several previous studies (Lin and Fisher, 2007; Sprague et al., 2003).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The function of edn3b in iridophore development and pigmentation is conserved between zebrafish and glass catfish.

    “The edn3b gene, identified as a ligand for the endothelin receptor signaling in larval iridophores, significantly reduces iridophore number when knocked down in zebrafish (Krauss et al., 2014a).”
    “Thus, loss of edn3b likely contributes to the transparent phenotype observed in glass catfish.”
6 of 6

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Repeat coverage percentage uses a different assembly size

    Minor

    The reported 223.4 Mb of repeats is 34.24% of the stated 652.4 Mb de novo assembly, not 35.2%. It is approximately 35.2% of the 634.7 Mb anchored to chromosomes, but the sentence specifies the de novo assembly.

    Reported 35.2 · recomputed 34.242796

  • Number of comparison species differs between methods and figure

    Minor

    The methods say genome and protein sequences were downloaded for 12 representative species, but the ensuing list names 14. Figure 2 likewise describes 14 representative fish species alongside glass catfish.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bian, C., 深圳大学生命与海洋科学学院水产基因组学实验室, 广. 深. 5., Laboratory of Aquatic Genomics, C. O. L. S. A. O., Li, R.-H., Ruan, Z.-Q., Chen, W.-T., Huang, Y., Liu, L.-Y., Zhou, H.-L., Chong, C.-M., Mu, X.-D., Shi, Q., 中国水产科学研究院珠江水产研究所广东省现代农业休闲渔业工程技术研究中心, 农., 深圳市华大海洋研究院, 深., 中国科学院成都生物研究所四川省生态恢复与生物多样性保护重点实验室, 四. 成. 6., 嘉应学院生命科学学院, 广. 梅. 5., 中国科学院水生生物研究所国家斑马鱼资源中心, 湖. 武. 4., 中国农业科学院农业基因组研究所深圳研究室, 广., 澳门大学中华医药研究院中药质量研究国家重点实验室, 澳. 9., 内江师范学院生命科学学院水生基因组学研究中心, 四. 内. 6., Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control for Aquatic Invasive Alien Species, M. O. A. A. R. A., Shenzhen Key Lab of Marine Genomics, G. P. K. L. O. M. B. I. M. E. A., CAS Key Laboratory of Mountain Ecological Restoration and Bioresource Utilization & Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, C. I. O. B., School of Life Sciences, J. U., China Zebrafish Resource Center, N. A. B. R. C., Shenzhen Branch, G. L. F. L. M. A., State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, I. O. C. M. S., & Center for Aquatic Genomics, C. O. L. S.
Affiliations
  • BGI Group (China) (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • University of Macau (MO)
Corresponding author
  • Bian, Chao
  • Shi, Qiong
Venue
Zoological Research
Published
2024
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
1027-1036
ISSN
2095-8137 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396718471
Cited by
4
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • 动物学研究 (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences (20220202)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFE0139700, 2023YFE0205100)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
chromosome-level genome assembly, iridophores, melanophores, albinism, endothelin-3, pigmentation, zebrafish mutants, synteny
MeSH terms
Animals, Catfishes, Chromosomes, Phenotype, Pigmentation, Genome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-02.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-02.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review