Cited by 66Comparative Animal Anatomy StudiesPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsFish Biology and Ecology Studies

Skin histology of Rivulus ocellatus marmoratus: apparent adaptation for aerial respiration

Grizzle, John M., Thiyagarajah, Arunthavarani·1987·Copeia

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1446065

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A number of amphibious fish species have capillaries close to the epidermal surface, providing an effective surface for gas exchange.

    “Histological studies have shown that a number of species have capillaries close to the epidermal surface (Grizzle and Thiyagarajah, 1987; Park et al., 2000; Yokoya and Tamura, 1992), providing an effective surface for gas exchange (e.g. Bridges, 1988; Graham, 1973; Martin, 2014; Tamura et al., 1976).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grizzle, J. M., & Thiyagarajah, A.
Venue
Copeia
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1987-02-11
Volume
1987
Issue
1
Pages
237
ISSN
0045-8511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2335697454
Cited by
66
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Copeia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
skin histology, aerial respiration, air-breathing fish, skin respiration, fish adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review