The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Child Care and the Labor Supply of Married Women: Reduced Form Evidence
Abstract
This paper empirically analyzes family demands for market and nonmarket child care services and the impact of these demands on the work effort of married women. The paper first develops a general model of child care and labor force participation. The model predicts that higher wages increase the likelihood of labor force participation and that higher costs decrease the likelihood of child care utilization. The paper then develops a three-equation, reduced-form econometric specification of the general model. The equations in the specification are estimated simultaneously using 1985 data from the Survey of Income Program Participation. The estimates reveal that the cost of market child care has a strong negative effect on the labor supply of married women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fertility, Employment, and Child-Care Costs
Blau, D. M., & Robins, P. K. (1989) · Demography · doi:10.2307/2061526 · Cited by 261
Cited by
Explaining the Decline in the U.S. Employment-to-Population Ratio: a Review of the Evidence
Abraham, K., & Kearney, M. (2018) · doi:10.3386/w24333 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Ribar, D. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Human Resources
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 134
- ISSN
- 0022-166X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1508717584
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
