The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hydraulic Stream Ecology: Observed Patterns and Potential Applications
Abstract
Although it is well known that metabolism, feeding, and behaviour of lotic organisms is influenced by various flow characteristics, hydraulic variables usually are not accurately measured in lotic ecology studies. Using an approach we call "hydraulic stream ecology", we link organismic responses to a more comprehensive treatment of the physical environment. Since a unified analytical solution for all important hydraulic variables in running waters does not exist at the moment, we advocate a simpler view of the physical system. We demonstrate methods for estimating complex hydraulic key characteristics, like turbulence in the free flow, turbulence close to the stream bottom, and the force of flow prevailing at the bottom. Calculations of these complex key characteristics require measurement of simple hydraulic characteristics like mean velocity, water surface slope, depth, bottom roughness, kinematic viscosity, and density of the water. The hydraulic environment shows characteristic patterns within whole catchments or within reaches of different types of running waters (e.g., high gradient mountain stream, lowland stream, mid-order river). Examples from lotic macroinvertebrates, in particular original data on the water bug Aphelocheirus aestivalis (Fabr.), demonstrate how organismic responses are linked to the hydraulic environment. The body shapes of many lotic zoobenthos are not well adapted to minimize forces of flow, as has been generally believed. Indeed, flow forces are rather stressful for these animals. Critical resources in swift flowing microzones can often be exploited by zoobenthos for only restricted periods, a view that is consistent with the temporal, vertical migration patterns observed for most stream invertebrates. The stress of flow and temporal exposure to it may be correlated with the distribution of lotic zoobenthos. Substratum characteristics, usually perceived as a major factor explaining the distribution of lotic macroinvertebrates, is less important than mean velocity and the complex hydraulic key characteristics. Complex hydraulic characteristics are most useful in modeling specific relationships between the distribution of zoobenthos within a stream reach and the physical habitat, which differ depending on developmental stage of the organism, season, and site. On the catchment scale, the distribution of zoobenthos, and, consequently, longitudinal zonation are also largely dependent on hydraulics. Other groups of organisms found in running waters (e.g., microorganisms and fish) show responses to hydraulics that are comparable to those of lotic macroinvertebrates. There is evidence that some species can alter the hydraulic environment for other individuals (or species). Hydraulic stream ecology provides methods to scale flow in lotic research, which will lead to an increase in replicability and predictability in studies of running water ecosystems. We suggest that researchers who have measured relevant simple hydraulic characteristics in many past studies reevaluate their data considering the role of complex hydraulic key characteristics for the distribution of organisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Purcell, E. M. (1977) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.10903 · Cited by 4,360
Cited by
Biodiversity of Stream Insects: Variation at Local, Basin, and Regional Scales
Vinson, M. R., & Hawkins, C. P. (1998) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.271 · Cited by 538
Mesocosm Experiments as a Tool for Ecological Climate-Change Research
Stewart, R. I. A., Dossena, M., Bohan, D. A., Jeppesen, E., Kordas, R. L., Ledger, M. E., Meerhoff, M., Moss, B., Mulder, C., Shurin, J. B., et al. (2013) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-417199-2.00002-1 · Cited by 387
Gore, J. A., & Shields (1995) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1312553 · Cited by 274
Self-citationPatch dynamics and environmental heterogeneity in lotic ecosystems
Winemiller, K. O., Flecker, A. S., & Hoeinghaus, D. J. (2010) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.1899/08-048.1 · Cited by 266
Effective River Restoration in the 21st Century
Friberg, N., Angelopoulos, N. V., Buijse, A. D., Cowx, I. G., Kail, J., Moe, T. F., Moir, H., O’Hare, M. T., Verdonschot, P. F. M., & Wolter, C. (2016) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/bs.aecr.2016.08.010 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Statzner, B., Gore, J. A., & Resh, V. H.
- Venue
- Journal of the North American Benthological Society
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1988-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 307-360
- ISSN
- 0887-3593 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-237X
- OpenAlex
- W2320062698
- Cited by
- 719
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydraulic Stream Ecology: Observed Patterns and Potential Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1467296
- The paper
- Statzner, B., Gore, J. A., & Resh, V. H. (1988). Hydraulic Stream Ecology: Observed Patterns and Potential Applications. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. https://doi.org/10.2307/1467296
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.