The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Eutrophication of streams and rivers: dissolved nutrient-chlorophyll relationships for benthic algae
Abstract
Statistical models for predicting the effects on algal biomass of eutrophication are much better developed for lentic systems than for lotic systems, partly because of the dynamic physical nature of streams as controlled by flood regimes. I analyzed data from 30 sites in 25 runoff-fed streams and rivers to develop statistical models for mean monthly and maximum chlorophyll a as a function of soluble nutrient concentrations and days of accrual (reflecting the frequency of flood disturbance events). Variation in stream-water nutrients explained 12–22.6% of the variation in mean monthly chlorophyll a and 29.5–32.5% of the variation in maximum chlorophyll a among sites. Days of accrual explained 39.7% and 61.8 % of the variation in mean monthly and maximum chlorophyll a, respectively. Multiple regression models combining dissolved nutrient data and days of accrual explained 43.7–48.8% of the variation in mean monthly chlorophyll a and 72.1–74.1% of the variation in maximum chlorophyll a among sites. In streams with infrequent floods and long accrual periods (e.g., >100 d), a relatively small increase in dissolved nutrients greatly increased the frequency of high biomass events. However, as could be anticipated, this result did not occur in more flood-prone streams. A nomograph to predict oligo-, meso-, and eutrophic conditions as a function of nutrient concentrations and days of accrual is presented based on the regression models for maximum chlorophyll a. The models need further testing, but might be useful for predicting the effects of changes in nutrients on benthic algal biomass in other temperate streams and rivers. I suggest that variable nutrient criteria for the prevention of benthic algal proliferations could be set in streams in relation to regimes of local flood frequency and expected time available for biomass accrual. The present analysis suggests that managing nutrient supply could not only reduce the magnitude of maximum biomass, but also reduce the frequency and duration of benthic algal proliferations in streams.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Camargo, J. A., & Alonso, Á. (2006) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2006.05.002 · Cited by 2,248
Eutrophication and trophic state in rivers and streams
Dodds, W. K. (2006) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0671 · Cited by 451
Effects of human-driven water stress on river ecosystems: a meta-analysis
Sabater, S., Bregoli, F., Acuña, V., Barceló, D., Elosegi, A., Ginebreda, A., Marcé, R., Muñoz, I., Sabater-Liesa, L., & Ferreira, V. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29807-7 · Cited by 187
Metadata
- Authors
- Biggs, B. J. F.
- Venue
- Journal of the North American Benthological Society
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-31
- ISSN
- 0887-3593 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-237X
- OpenAlex
- W2148361960
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eutrophication of streams and rivers: dissolved nutrient-chlorophyll relationships for benthic algae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1468279
- The paper
- Biggs, B. J. F. (2000). Eutrophication of streams and rivers: dissolved nutrient-chlorophyll relationships for benthic algae. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. https://doi.org/10.2307/1468279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.