Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 458

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Eutrophication of streams and rivers: dissolved nutrient-chlorophyll relationships for benthic algae

Biggs, Barry J. F.·2000·Journal of the North American Benthological Society

Abstract

Statistical models for predicting the effects on algal biomass of eutrophication are much better developed for lentic systems than for lotic systems, partly because of the dynamic physical nature of streams as controlled by flood regimes. I analyzed data from 30 sites in 25 runoff-fed streams and rivers to develop statistical models for mean monthly and maximum chlorophyll a as a function of soluble nutrient concentrations and days of accrual (reflecting the frequency of flood disturbance events). Variation in stream-water nutrients explained 12–22.6% of the variation in mean monthly chlorophyll a and 29.5–32.5% of the variation in maximum chlorophyll a among sites. Days of accrual explained 39.7% and 61.8 % of the variation in mean monthly and maximum chlorophyll a, respectively. Multiple regression models combining dissolved nutrient data and days of accrual explained 43.7–48.8% of the variation in mean monthly chlorophyll a and 72.1–74.1% of the variation in maximum chlorophyll a among sites. In streams with infrequent floods and long accrual periods (e.g., >100 d), a relatively small increase in dissolved nutrients greatly increased the frequency of high biomass events. However, as could be anticipated, this result did not occur in more flood-prone streams. A nomograph to predict oligo-, meso-, and eutrophic conditions as a function of nutrient concentrations and days of accrual is presented based on the regression models for maximum chlorophyll a. The models need further testing, but might be useful for predicting the effects of changes in nutrients on benthic algal biomass in other temperate streams and rivers. I suggest that variable nutrient criteria for the prevention of benthic algal proliferations could be set in streams in relation to regimes of local flood frequency and expected time available for biomass accrual. The present analysis suggests that managing nutrient supply could not only reduce the magnitude of maximum biomass, but also reduce the frequency and duration of benthic algal proliferations in streams.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1468279

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 458

Metadata

Authors
Biggs, B. J. F.
Venue
Journal of the North American Benthological Society
Published
2000-03
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
17-31
ISSN
  • 0887-3593 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-237X
OpenAlex
W2148361960
Cited by
458
References
0
FWCI
6.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eutrophication of streams and rivers: dissolved nutrient-chlorophyll relationships for benthic algae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1468279
The paper
Biggs, B. J. F. (2000). Eutrophication of streams and rivers: dissolved nutrient-chlorophyll relationships for benthic algae. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. https://doi.org/10.2307/1468279

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.