The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Species pool: the concept, its determination and significance for community restoration
Abstract
Abstract.The concept of species pool is reviewed. It is suggested to maintain the terms regional pool and local pool but replace actual pool by community pool. The regional and local pool are considered as selections from the regional and local flora based on ecological similarity. It is also suggested to include in the community pool a selection of species present only as diaspores in the diaspore bank (including diaspores from the seed rain), the selection being based on the same ecological criteria. Four approaches to determine the species pool are discussed: ecological, functional and phytosociological similarity, and an experimental approach. The phytosociological approach appears to be promising. The species pool is elaborated as a fuzzy set in the sense that each species of a community or a local or regional flora is a member of any community, local or regional species pool with different degrees of membership. This membership is defined as a probability of a species to become part of the community pool of a target community which is a function of the ecological (environmen‐tal/functional/phytosociological) similarity of the species with the target community; the shortness of the distance of its nearest populations, the frequency/abundance, the dispersal capacity, the actual presence of dispersal mechanisms, the germinability of newly arrived diaspores, and the longevity of seeds (viability) in the diaspore bank. The information on species pools is needed for designing experiments where the number of species in a community is to be manipulated, for instance in restoration management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harper, J. L. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,128
Fuzzy Set Theory—and Its Applications
Zimmermann, H.-J. (2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0646-0 · Cited by 7,526
Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology
Kuchler, A. W., Mueller-Dombois, D., & Ellenberg, H. (1976) · Geographical Review · doi:10.2307/213332 · Cited by 7,375
Trenbath, B., & Harper, J. L. (1978) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2402622 · Cited by 6,942
Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes
Grime, J. P. (1979) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 5,371
Ecology and Evolution of Communities
Cody, M. L., & Diamond, J. M. (1976) · Nature · doi:10.1038/260204c0 · Cited by 3,065
Trade-Offs in Life-History Evolution
Stearns, S. C. (1989) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.2307/2389364 · Cited by 2,852
Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa
Weber, H. E., Düll, R., & Ellenberg, H. (1992) · Cited by 2,774
Braun-Blanquet, J. (1964) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-8110-2 · Cited by 2,744
Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes
Weaver, T., & Grime, J. P. (1980) · Journal of Range Management · doi:10.2307/3898436 · Cited by 2,548
Cited by
Patterns of plant species richness in relation to different environments: An appraisal
Pausas, J. G., & Austin, M. P. (2001) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.2307/3236601 · Cited by 558
Metadata
- Authors
- Zobel, M., van der Maarel, E., & Dupré, C.
- Venue
- Applied Vegetation Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-02-24
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-66
- ISSN
- 1402-2001 (ISSN-L)
- 1654-109X
- OpenAlex
- W2156825581
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 74
- FWCI
- 22.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Species pool: the concept, its determination and significance for community restoration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1479085
- The paper
- Zobel, M., van der Maarel, E., & Dupré, C. (1998). Species pool: the concept, its determination and significance for community restoration. Applied Vegetation Science. https://doi.org/10.2307/1479085
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.