Cited by 450Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsPhenomenology and Existential Philosophy

Mental Paint and Mental Latex

Block, Ned·1996·Philosophical Issues

Abstract

The greatest chasm in the philosophy of mind -maybe even all of philosophydivides two perspectives on consciousness. The two perspectives differ on whether there is anything in the phenomenal character of conscious experience that goes beyond the intentional, the cognitive and the functional. A convenient terminological handle on the dispute is whether there are qualia. Those who think that the phenomenal character of conscious experience goes beyond the intentional, the cognitive and the functional are said to believe in qualitative properties of conscious experience, or qualia for short. The debates about qualia have recently focused on the notion of representation, with issues about functionalism always in the background. All can agree that there are representational contents of thoughts, for example the representational content that virtue is its own reward. And friends of qualia can agree that experiences at least sometimes have representational content too, e.g. that something red and round occludes something blue and square. The recent focus of disagreement is on whether the phenomenal character of experience

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1522889

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Block, N.
Corresponding author
Block, Ned
Venue
Philosophical Issues
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1996
Volume
7
Pages
19
ISSN
1533-6077 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081557792
Cited by
450
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Philosophical Issues (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
Keywords
qualia, representational content, functionalism, intentional content, philosophy of mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review