Cited by 329Marine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyInvertebrate Taxonomy and EcologyMarine Biology and Ecology Research

Molecular Evidence for Cryptic Species of Aurelia aurita(Cnidaria, Scyphozoa)

Dawson, Michael N., Jacobs, David K.·2001·The Biological Bulletin

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1543089

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dawson, M. N., & Jacobs, D. K.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
The Biological Bulletin
Published
2001-02
Volume
200
Issue
1
Pages
92-96
ISSN
  • 0006-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-8697
OpenAlex
W2142731306
Cited by
329
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Biology and Ecology Research
Keywords
Aurelia aurita, cryptic species, jellyfish, Scyphozoa, molecular phylogeny, species delimitation, cnidarian taxonomy
MeSH terms
Animals, Cnidaria, Electron Transport Complex IV, Demography, Biological Evolution, Phylogeny, Species Specificity, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA, Intergenic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review