The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-Organized Fish Schools: An Examination of Emergent Properties
Open accessAbstract
Heterogeneous, "aggregated" patterns in the spatial distributions of individuals are almost universal across living organisms, from bacteria to higher vertebrates. Whereas specific features of aggregations are often visually striking to human eyes, a heuristic analysis based on human vision is usually not sufficient to answer fundamental questions about how and why organisms aggregate. What are the individual-level behavioral traits that give rise to these features? When qualitatively similar spatial patterns arise from purely physical mechanisms, are these patterns in organisms biologically significant, or are they simply epiphenomena that are likely characteristics of any set of interacting autonomous individuals? If specific features of spatial aggregations do confer advantages or disadvantages in the fitness of group members, how has evolution operated to shape individual behavior in balancing costs and benefits at the individual and group levels? Mathematical models of social behaviors such as schooling in fishes provide a promising avenue to address some of these questions. However, the literature on schooling models has lacked a common framework to objectively and quantitatively characterize relationships between individual-level behaviors and group-level patterns. In this paper, we briefly survey similarities and differences in behavioral algorithms and aggregation statistics among existing schooling models. We present preliminary results of our efforts to develop a modeling framework that synthesizes much of this previous work, and to identify relationships between behavioral parameters and group-level statistics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511597237 · Cited by 4,322
Self-Organization in Biological Systems
Sneyd, J., Theraula, G., Bonabeau, E., Deneubourg, J.-L., & Franks, N. R. (2001) · doi:10.1515/9780691212920 · Cited by 2,949
Cited by
Vicsek, T., & Zafeiris, A. (2012) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.03.004 · Cited by 2,923
Codling, E. A., Plank, M. J., & Benhamou, S. (2008) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0014 · Cited by 1,482
Sumpter, D. J. T. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781400837106 · Cited by 914
Consensus decision making in animals
Conradt, L., & Roper, T. J. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.008 · Cited by 872
Inherent noise can facilitate coherence in collective swarm motion
Yates, C. A., Erban, R., Escudero, C., Couzin, I. D., Buhl, C., Kevrekidis, I. G., Maini, P. K., & Sumpter, D. J. T. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0811195106 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Parrish, J. K., Viscido, S. V., & Grünbaum, D.
- Venue
- The Biological Bulletin
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 202
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 296-305
- ISSN
- 0006-3185 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8697
- OpenAlex
- W2117279095
- Cited by
- 716
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-Organized Fish Schools: An Examination of Emergent Properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1543482
- The paper
- Parrish, J. K., Viscido, S. V., & Grünbaum, D. (2002). Self-Organized Fish Schools: An Examination of Emergent Properties. The Biological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.2307/1543482
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.