Cited by 79Crustacean biology and ecologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Ecology and Behavior of Gecarcoidea natalis, the Christmas Island Red Crab, During the Annual Breeding Migration

Open access
Adamczewska, Agnieszka M., Morris, Stephen·2001·The Biological Bulletin

Abstract

The terrestrial crab Gecarcoidea natalis is endemic to the forests of Christmas Island but must migrate each year to the coast to breed. During 1993 and 1995, radio-tracking, mark and recapture, and counting methods were used to establish the routes, walking speeds, direction of travel, and destinations of migrating crabs, as well as crab numbers and distribution. The density of crabs ranged from 0.09 to 0.57 crabs per square meter, which gave a population estimate of 43.7 million adult crabs on the island. During the dry season the crabs were relatively inactive but on arrival of the wet season immediately began their migration. The crabs generally walked in straight lines, and most crabs from around the Island traveled toward the northwest shore instead of simply walking toward the nearest shore. The maximum recorded distance walked by a red crab in one day was 1460 m, but the mean was 680 m per day in 1993 and 330 m in 1995. Comparing the 1993 and 1995 study seasons, there was a 3-week difference in the timing of the start of the migration, but the spawning date was fixed by the lunar phase and took place 17 to 18 days after mating. In 1993, late rain prompted a "rushed" migration and crabs walked directly to their shore destinations; in contrast, in 1995 most crabs made stops of 1 to 7 days during the downward migration. By giving the crabs a chance to feed along the way and minimizing the time that the population was concentrated near the shore, these stops may be important in ensuring that the animals have enough food after the long dry season. Furthermore, this behavior implies that the crabs are able to judge how far away they are from the shore during the migration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1543512

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adamczewska, A. M., & Morris, S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Venue
The Biological Bulletin
Published
2001-06
Volume
200
Issue
3
Pages
305-320
ISSN
  • 0006-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-8697
OpenAlex
W2120966030
Cited by
79
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Biological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
Gecarcoidea natalis, breeding migration, migration routes, walking speed, crab behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Brachyura, Emigration and Immigration, Female, Locomotion, Male, Micronesia, Radio, Reproduction, Seasons, Sexual Behavior, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review