Cited by 265Comparative Animal Anatomy StudiesCephalopods and Marine BiologyPhysiological and biochemical adaptations

Hidden in Plain Sight: The Ecology and Physiology of Organismal Transparency

Open access
Johnsen, Sönke·2001·The Biological Bulletin

Abstract

Despite the prevalence and importance of transparency in organisms, particularly pelagic species, it is a poorly understood characteristic. This article reviews the current state of knowledge on the distribution, ecology, and physical basis of biological transparency. Particular attention is paid to the distribution of transparent species relative to their optical environment, the relationship between transparency and visual predation, the physics of transparency, and what is known about the anatomical and ultrastructural modifications required to achieve this condition. Transparency is shown to be primarily a pelagic trait, uncommon in other aquatic habitats and extremely rare on land. Experimental and theoretical studies in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems have shown that transparency is a successful form of camouflage, and that several visual adaptations seem to counter it. The physical basis of transparency is still poorly understood, but anatomical observations and mathematical models show that there are various routes to transparency. Future avenues for research include examination of the ultrastructure and optical properties of transparent tissue, exploring the link between transparent species and special visual modifications in the species they interact with, and analysis of the evolution of transparency using comparative methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1543609

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transparency in animals is a complex form of camouflage involving mechanisms that reduce light scattering and absorption throughout the organism.

    “Transparency in animals is a complex form of camouflage involving mechanisms that reduce light scattering and absorption throughout the organism.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnsen, S.
Affiliations
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US)
Corresponding author
Johnsen, Sönke
Venue
The Biological Bulletin
Published
2001-12
Volume
201
Issue
3
Pages
301-318
ISSN
  • 0006-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-8697
OpenAlex
W2124477965
Cited by
265
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Biological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Cephalopods and Marine Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
Keywords
optical camouflage, visual predation, pelagic species, optical environment, ultrastructure, visual adaptation, terrestrial organisms
MeSH terms
Animals, Ecology, Fishes, Invertebrates, Marine Biology, Mollusca, Pigmentation, Polychaeta, Scyphozoa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review