The Global Taxonomy Initiative in Africa
Open accessAbstract
The Conference of Parties (COP) to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has recognised the currently existing taxonomic impediment to ensure the conservation and management of the world's biodiversity. In response, COP has formulated the concept of a Global Taxonomy Initiative (GTI) to promote a concerted effort among international funding agencies, national and subnational governments, and nongovernmental bodies. The GTI Africa Regional Workshop was held at the Kirstenbosch National Botanical Garden, Claremont, Cape Town, South Africa, from 27 February to 1 March 2001. The Workshop was attended by a total of 43 delegates, representing 32 countries (23 African) and 36 institutions or organisations. The Kirstenbosch Declaration was compiled during the Workshop and summarises the major decisions and proposals made by the delegates at the Workshop. A Final Report summarising the discussions and decisions from the GTI Africa Regional Workshop is being prepared and will be distributed to all interested parties. A taxonomic needs assessment for Africa has been conducted as part of this project. The results from this first ever comprehensive taxonomic needs assessment covering plants, animals and microorganisms for the African continent as a unit, are reported on here and forms an important part of the Final Report. The needs assessment highlights the prominent taxonomic impediment currently existing in the continent. Taxonomic capacity building is urgently needed in Africa; therefore, African taxonomic institutions can benefit immensely from the Global Taxonomy Initiative.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This shortfall is most evident in parts of Africa, Asia, and South America, such as West and Central Africa, the Amazon Basin, Central Asia, most of India, and some Indonesian islands.
“This is most evident in parts of Africa, Asia, and South America, such as West and Central Africa, the Amazon Basin, Central Asia, most of India, and some Indonesian islands (e.g., Java, Sumatra, Borneo), supporting calls for regional taxonomic work (e.g., Klopper et al. 2002; Chatterjee et al. 2020; Monadjem et al. 2024).”
From How many mammal species are there now? Updates and trends in taxonomic, nomenclatural, and geographic knowledge (2025) · cites this paper as Klopper et al. 2002
Global South countries are developing in-country biodiversity research capacity and infrastructure, addressing explicit goals for bridging the Linnaean and Wallacean shortfalls.
“Global South countries are developing in-country biodiversity research capacity and infrastructure, addressing explicit goals for bridging the Linnaean and Wallacean shortfalls (Klopper et al. 2002; Prathapan and Rajan 2020).”
From How many mammal species are there now? Updates and trends in taxonomic, nomenclatural, and geographic knowledge (2025) · cites this paper as Klopper et al. 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Burgin, C. J., Zijlstra, J. S., Becker, M. A., Handika, H., Alston, J. M., Widness, J., Liphardt, S., Huckaby, D. G., & Upham, N. S. (2025) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyaf047 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Klopper, R. R., Smith, G. F., & Chikuni, A. C.
- Affiliations
- Office of the Research and Scientific Services Director National Botanical Institute Private Bag X101 Pretoria 0001 South Africa
- National Herbarium and Botanic Gardens of Malawi PO Box 528 Zomba Malawi
- Venue
- TAXON
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 159-165
- ISSN
- 0040-0262 (ISSN-L)
- 1996-8175
- OpenAlex
- W2038573870
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Taxon (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Naturvårdsverket
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
- Keywords
- taxonomic impediment, biodiversity conservation, Convention on Biological Diversity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review