The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States
Abstract
This book argues that the post-1970 rise in international capital mobility has not contributed to the retrenchment of developed welfare states. Nor has globalization reduced the revenue-raising capacities of governments and undercut the political institutions that support the welfare state. Rather, institutional features of the polity and the welfare state determine the extent to which the economic and political pressures associated with globalization produce welfare state retrenchment. In systems characterized by electoral institutions, social corporatist interest representation and policy-making, centralized political authority, and social insurance-based program structures, pro-welfare state interests are favored. In nations characterized by majoritarian electoral institutions, pluralist interest representation and policy-making, decentralization of policy-making authority, and liberal program structure, the economic and political pressures attendant on globalization are translated into rollbacks of social protection. Globalization has had least impact on large welfare states of Northern Europe and most effect on small welfare states of Anglo nations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Campbell, J. L. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.25275684 · Cited by 4,906
Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options
Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912907313077 · Cited by 3,827
All for All: Equality, Corruption, and Social Trust
Rothstein, B., & Uslaner, E. M. (2005) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.2006.0022 · Cited by 1,529
Social Traps and the Problem of Trust
Rothstein, B. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490323 · Cited by 929
Distribution and Redistribution in Postindustrial Democracies
Bradley, D., Huber, E., Moller, S., Nielsen, F., & Stephens, J. D. (2003) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.2003.0009 · Cited by 785
Metadata
- Authors
- Benoit, C., & Swank, D.
- Venue
- Contemporary Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 614
- ISSN
- 0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078035010
- Cited by
- 604
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 341.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1556501
- The paper
- Benoit, C., & Swank, D. (2003). Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. Contemporary Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556501
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.