The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On Legal Sanctions
Abstract
Sanctions are officially imposed punishments aimed at enforcement of legal obligations. They are said to constitute the core, if not the defining characteristic, of the legal order. Inadequate sanctions are blamed for the failures of legal control in such divergent areas as international law, domestic crime, and civil rights. Despite the presumed importance of sanctions in the legal process, however, serious attention has rarely been paid to the topic.' This paper examines sanctions from the perspective of the social sciences. It consists of two parts: a brief review of existing knowledge relevant to legal sanctions, and a preliminary report of a field experiment aimed at generating more information on the subject. The first part begins with an oversimplified account of conventional wisdom in the area of sanctions, uses some research findings to show the inaccuracy of many of these conventional beliefs, and suggests the complexity of the problem. The second part narrows the questions to be examined, describes the research technique employed in trying to answer some of these questions, and gives initial results from that research. Both parts are presented here in a frank effort to elicit suggestions which will make the final report more useful as a social scientific contribution to iurisDrudence.2
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Campbell, D. T. (1969) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0027982 · Cited by 1,885
The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour
Kirchler, E., & Braithwaite, V. (2007) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511628238 · Cited by 1,206
Tax Evasion and Tax Rates: An Analysis of Individual Returns
Clotfelter, C. T. (1983) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1924181 · Cited by 1,002
The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes
Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612449177 · Cited by 928
Assessing the impact of planned social change
Campbell, D. T. (1979) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(79)90048-x · Cited by 957
“There is a way to statistically relate research data and administrative records without revealing confidential data on individual (Schwartz & Orleans, 1967; Campbell, Boruch, Schwartz & Steinberg, 1975; Boruch & Campbell, 1974).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwartz, R. D., & Orleans, S.
- Venue
- The University of Chicago Law Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1967
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 274
- ISSN
- 0041-9494 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2472532806
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On Legal Sanctions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1598934
- The paper
- Schwartz, R. D., & Orleans, S. (1967). On Legal Sanctions. The University of Chicago Law Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1598934
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.